Winnipesaukee Forum

Winnipesaukee Forum (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Lakeport Landing business (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18493)

john60ri 11-27-2014 10:10 AM

Fll
 
Surprised at the criticism of FLL. I've always found him very entertaining. Hang in there, pal!

fatlazyless 11-27-2014 12:19 PM

.... City Council defers decision
 
"Alternative for Lakeport Landing? City Council defers decision"

Today's November 27 Laconia Daily Sun has a nuts and bolts report on the latest "what's happening" at Lakeport Landing. Some interesting stuff!

The Laconia City Council voted unanimously to wait at least 90-days before making any decisions on how to proceed with the Lakeport Landing property.

mcdude 05-27-2015 12:31 PM

You'll see a familiar name in this article
 
Laconia Daily Sun

Quote:

City manager to negotiate sale of city lot
  • Published Date Wednesday, 27 May 2015 01:38

LACONIA — The City Council last night rejected two offers — one from Lakeport Landing and the other from Irwin Marine – for the property on Union Avenue leased for the past 30 years to Landing Landing, both of which fell shy of the appraised value of $480,000.
The property, a 0.81 acre strip between the roadway and railway was leased to Lakeport Landing in 1985 for 10 years with two 10-year renewal periods. The lease will expire on November 1, 2015 and cannot be renewed again. In 1987 Lakeport Landing constructed a 9,840-square-foot building on the lot. Under the terms of the lease, ownership of the building would revert to the city at the expiration date.
Erica Blizzard, who owns and operates Lakeport Landing, offered to purchase the property for $331,400 and subsequently Irwin Marine, which operates on the abutting lot, submitted an offer of $335,000.
Councilor Brenda Baer (Ward 4) proposed negotiating a sale of the property to Lakeport Landing at its appraised value. She was joined only by Councilor Arman Bolduc (Ward 6). With Councilors Henery Lipman (Ward 3), David Bownes (Ward 2) and Ava Doyle (Ward 1) in the majority, Baer's motion failed by a vote of three-to-two.
Lipman proposed authorizing the City Manager Scott Myers to negotiate with both Lakeport Landing and Irwin Marine, with respect to the appraised value as well as other conditions for the sale of the property. The city will require easements to maintain the retaining wall along Union Avenue. The owner of the property would be expected to maintain its taxable value for a specified period of time. Should Lakeport Landing fail to acquire the property, the transaction would be subject to a transition period of up to two years to enable the firm to make alternative arrangements for its operations. Finally, prospective buyers would asked to consider subdividing the property and transfer approximately a third of the lot to the city for a parking lot.
Lipman said he anticipated these discussion would begin soon with an eye to structuring a sale of the property in July.

<?xml:namespace prefix = "fb" ns = "http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" /><fb:like href="http://www.laconiadailysun.com/index.php/newsx/local-news/86311-lakeport-landing-sale" action="like" layout="standard" font="verdana" colorscheme="light" width="320" show_faces="false"></fb:like> <IFRAME tabIndex=0 id=I0_1432747663267 title=+1 style="HEIGHT: 20px; WIDTH: 90px; POSITION: static; LEFT: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; TOP: 0px; VISIBILITY: visible" marginHeight=0 src="https://apis.google.com/se/0/_/+1/fastbutton?usegapi=1&size=medium&hl=en-GB&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.laconiadailysun.com&url =http%3A%2F%2Fwww.laconiadailysun.com%2Findex.php% 2Fnewsx%2Flocal-news%2F86311-lakeport-landing-sale&gsrc=3p&ic=1&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fscs%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fk%3Doz.gapi.en_US.YqpD8a2mz-8.O%2Fm%3D__features__%2Fam%3DAQ%2Frt%3Dj%2Fd%3D1% 2Ft%3Dzcms%2Frs%3DAGLTcCPs2ZeVwdTbFnkRBExJVLHllHWv 2A#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C _resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled%2Cdrefresh%2C erefresh&id=I0_1432747663267&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fw ww.laconiadailysun.com&pfname=&rpctoken=51646466" frameBorder=0 width="100%" name=I0_1432747663267 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no data-gapiattached="true"></IFRAME>

AC2717 05-27-2015 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcdude (Post 245515)
Laconia Daily Sun

its only worth what people are willing to pay for it
$480k is a ridiculous amount for that strip of property especially the amount of work anyone other than Lakeport or Irwin would have to do with it

I cant believe I am asking (cause I Know the answer) what is wrong with these people:(

BroadHopper 05-27-2015 12:51 PM

Reading between the lines
 
The city appraised value of 480K is for the land and building. After the sale, the buyer is to relinquish a third of the lot to the city. The city did not specify that piece if the property. Also the buyer would need to provide an easement to the city regarding the retaining wall along Union Ave. Having all that, the 330 and some change is a fair value for the property.

Obviously to Brenda Baer, its all about the revenue. She doesn't care about the what will become of the future. I hope to God someone replace that woman. During her tenure she has done more harm than good in the city.

Rich 05-27-2015 02:51 PM

Quote:

Erica Blizzard, who owns and operates Lakeport Landing
Is this the person that had an 'event' that eventually led to the creating of a speed limit on the lake? Or am I mistaken? I'm not a local.

Phantom 05-27-2015 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 245531)
Is this the person that had an 'event' that eventually led to the creating of a speed limit on the lake? Or am I mistaken? I'm not a local.

Don't know that it "Led to the Speed Limit" being placed into affect ..... but yes, she had a horrific boating accident

.

Misha888 05-27-2015 11:01 PM

They should . . .
 
sell it to The State of NH. The state pays top dollar for real estate. But, that's another thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 245518)
The city appraised value of 480K is for the land and building. After the sale, the buyer is to relinquish a third of the lot to the city. The city did not specify that piece if the property. Also the buyer would need to provide an easement to the city regarding the retaining wall along Union Ave. Having all that, the 330 and some change is a fair value for the property.

Obviously to Brenda Baer, its all about the revenue. She doesn't care about the what will become of the future. I hope to God someone replace that woman. During her tenure she has done more harm than good in the city.


secondcurve 05-28-2015 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AC2717 (Post 245516)
its only worth what people are willing to pay for it
$480k is a ridiculous amount for that strip of property especially the amount of work anyone other than Lakeport or Irwin would have to do with it

I cant believe I am asking (cause I Know the answer) what is wrong with these people:(

There are two interested buyers who opened the bidding at $331,400 and $335,000. Based upon this and the fact that the seller is a city (read stupid government entity and God knows Laconia has proven this time and time again) I'm fairly certain that the fair value of the property is closer to the appraised value. Obviously, the bidders started the process low hoping to attain the property at a discount. The city should move to install a parking lot and I'm sure the offers will substantially increase.

TiltonBB 05-28-2015 05:40 AM

Exposure
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AC2717 (Post 245516)
its only worth what people are willing to pay for it
$480k is a ridiculous amount for that strip of property especially the amount of work anyone other than Lakeport or Irwin would have to do with it

I cant believe I am asking (cause I Know the answer) what is wrong with these people:(

It is all about the exposure for sales but it comes with the benefit of additional space to operate your business. It just has to make financial sense.

The building and land are situated so that everyone that drives by sees their boats on display. I always look in when I go by to see the boats that are there. That is "free" advertising for them.

Since the markup on boats from wholesale to retail is about 30% the sale of one $300,000 boat, even at a negotiated price, will generate $50,000 to $90,000 for the seller. That income will more than offset the purchase price.

Now if that lot and the exposure helps to initiate the sale of 2 or 3 or more boats per year even a purchase price of $1,000,000 could make financial sense to the buyer.

AC2717 05-28-2015 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by secondcurve (Post 245572)
There are two interested buyers who opened the bidding at $331,400 and $335,000. Based upon this and the fact that the seller is a city (read stupid government entity and God knows Laconia has proven this time and time again) I'm fairly certain that the fair value of the property is closer to the appraised value. Obviously, the bidders started the process low hoping to attain the property at a discount. The city should move to install a parking lot and I'm sure the offers will substantially increase.

don't disagree here, but in the end it comes down to what someone is willing to pay

brk-lnt 05-28-2015 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AC2717 (Post 245587)
don't disagree here, but in the end it comes down to what someone is willing to pay

Agreed with that.

This is also, IMO, a very interesting case. The property has a relatively high prospective value to Lakeport Landing and Irwin's. However, given the fact that it's pretty much boxed in, it would be a poor location for many other businesses. It has no direct water access, so it's diminished value for any other kind of boat brokerage. Parking would appear to be a significant issue if it were to become independently owned.

This appears to be another in a long chain of poor decisions from the Laconia city planners.

mcdude 05-28-2015 08:37 AM

Laconia Daily Sun
Quote:

Published Date Thursday, 28 May 2015 12:37

LACONIA — City officials yesterday clarified the decision the City Council took when it met this week with respect to selling the property on Union Avenue, which has been leased to Lakeport Landing, Inc. for the past 30 years. The city manager has been asked to hold "informal conversations" with the two companies that have expressed interest in buying it in order to answer questions about the city's detailed position and gauge the level of remaining interest.
The property, a 0.81 acre strip between the roadway and railway was leased to Lakeport Landing in 1985 for 10 years with two 10-year renewal periods. The lease will expire on October 31, 2015 and the tenant has no renewal rights. In 1987 Lakeport Landing constructed a 9,840-square-foot building on the lot. Under the terms of the lease, ownership of the land and building would revert to the city at the expiration date.
In January, Erica Blizzard, who owns and operates Lakeport Landing, offered to purchase the property for $331.400 and subsequently Irwin Marine, which operates on the abutting lot, submitted a more recent offer of $335,000. Meanwhile, earlier this month Capital Appraisal Associates, Inc. of Concord pegged the market value of the land and building at $480,000.
With Councilor Bob Hamel (Ward 5) absent, five of the six councilors discussed the issue in a non-public session prior to their regularly scheduled meeting, but remained divided. Reading from a prepared statement in open session, Councilor Brenda Baer (Ward 4) offered a motion to negotiate the sale of the property solely with Blizzard. "First do no harm," she began. "We are dealing with people. We are dealing with our neighbors." She recalled that the council agreed to sell the former police station on Church Street to Binnie Media for $1 in an effort to revitalize downtown and said that selling to Blizzard would "build confidence with the business community." Baer urged her colleagues to "do the fair thing, the right thing." Only Councilor Armand Boluc (Ward 6), whose ward includes the property, joined with Baer and her motion failed by a vote of three-to-two.
Councilor Henry Lipman (Ward 3) then moved to reject both offers, which fell short of the appraised value of the property, and to authorize City Manager Scott Myers to conduct "informal conversations" with representatives of Lakeport Landing and Irwin Marine to inform them of terms and conditions of a sale of importance to the city.
Mayor Ed Engler said on Wednesday that the city manager was not directed to negotiate a sale of the property, but only to sound the two parties on reactions to four specific issues and report to the council when it meets on Monday, June 8.
First, he said that the city expected the sale price to match or exceed the appraised value of the property.
The city will also require an assurance that the owner of the property will not alter or demolish the existing building unless the change sustains or increases the existing taxable value of the property.
If the current tenant is displaced by the sale, the mayor said that the city will require the date of possession by the new owner be deferred for up to two years from the date of the closing to provide time for Lakeport Landing to secure new quarters. Should this provision be invoked, he explained that beginning when the lease expires on November 1, 2015, Lakeport Landing would pay a monthly rent consistent with the appraised value of the property.
Finally, Engler said that the property must be conveyed with easements enabling the city to maintain water and sewer lines as well as the retaining wall paralleling Union Avenue.

AC2717 05-28-2015 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcdude (Post 245597)
Laconia Daily Sun

so then who else but Lakeport or Irwin would buy it if they have the wait 2 years to do anything with it

value just went even lower in my opinion

either release it to Lakeport, open a leasing war or sell it to them or Irwin on fair market value -what someone is willing to pay for it

fatlazyless 05-28-2015 10:05 AM

Some little birdy like a honking, canada goose needs to quietly whisper a message to Irwin Marine; the property in discussion here would make a super-duper venue building for Irwin's personal watercraft, aka jetskis, and snowmobile business. While pwc's and snow-mo's are sold at the Alton and Hudson Irwin's, they are not sold at the Laconia Irwin's. Business at the Laconia Irwin pretty much slows down for the winter, so's having a big-visibility, snowmobile business at the Union Ave corner lot would give Irwin's a big boost up to an all-year-around business that could compete big-time with the nearby H K Motorsports.

So's, how much is that worth to Irwin's when it could re-pay this new property acquisition with a thirty year, commercial mortgage?

Woodsy 05-28-2015 10:40 AM

I do not want to see Lakeport Landing lose out on purchasing the property. I do think its vital for their business. They pay a ton of property taxes on their other properties. If they went under that would truly be a loss for Laconia & the Lake Winni community.

That being said, as a Laconia taxpayer, I think the city should get as close as possible to fair market value for the property purchase. I am not sure the assessed value is accurate. The city should have an appraisal done by an independent firm. Give Lakeport Landing the right of first refusal. If they decline... then let the games begin!

Woodsy

meredith weekender 05-28-2015 11:18 AM

This parcel is in a very high traffic area and would enhance both Lakeport and Irwin. The City has a duty to the taxpayers of Laconia to get the highest price possible for the property and ensure that its use will be in the best benefit of the City. The City should put the property up for a sealed bid with a minimum reserve and also have the bidders submit formal proposals as to what there plans for development of the property will be.

AC2717 05-28-2015 11:24 AM

not a bad idea at all

but it still all comes down to what someone is willing to pay for it, maybe that might perk up the offers a little

anything is worth anything you want it to be, but when you are selling it, it is only worth what another person will pay for it

meredith weekender 05-28-2015 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsy (Post 245620)
I do not want to see Lakeport Landing lose out on purchasing the property. I do think its vital for their business. They pay a ton of property taxes on their other properties. If they went under that would truly be a loss for Laconia & the Lake Winni community.

That being said, as a Laconia taxpayer, I think the city should get as close as possible to fair market value for the property purchase. I am not sure the assessed value is accurate. The city should have an appraisal done by an independent firm. Give Lakeport Landing the right of first refusal. If they decline... then let the games begin!

Woodsy



Lakeport does pay taxes on several properties that they own in Laconia BUT Irwin also pays taxes on several properties that they own as well.

secondcurve 05-28-2015 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AC2717 (Post 245611)
so then who else but Lakeport or Irwin would buy it if they have the wait 2 years to do anything with it

value just went even lower in my opinion

either release it to Lakeport, open a leasing war or sell it to them or Irwin on fair market value -what someone is willing to pay for it

Why should a 2-year notice be given at the end of a 10-year lease? The city and certaintly the tenant knew the expiration date of the lease 10-years ago. Shouldn't the tenant have been planning for the expiration date? If I rent an apartment do I wait untill the lease expires before I start thinking about where I will live in the future? I don't think so. I can see offering it to the exisiting tenant exclusively if they are willing to pay fair market (appraised) value. Otherwise, put the proerty up for auction and get the highest price. Then invest the proceeds in the dump down the street called Weirs Beach.

secondcurve 05-28-2015 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsy (Post 245620)
I do not want to see Lakeport Landing lose out on purchasing the property. I do think its vital for their business. They pay a ton of property taxes on their other properties. If they went under that would truly be a loss for Laconia & the Lake Winni community.

That being said, as a Laconia taxpayer, I think the city should get as close as possible to fair market value for the property purchase. I am not sure the assessed value is accurate. The city should have an appraisal done by an independent firm. Give Lakeport Landing the right of first refusal. If they decline... then let the games begin!

Woodsy

Woodsy: The article says that the city did commission an appraisal from an outside appraisal firm earlier in the month and the value was determined to be $480,000.....................Show me the money if you want to stay!

Woodsy 05-28-2015 12:04 PM

Weekender...

Yes Irwins pays taxes... but where will the $$$ come from if Lakeport goes under?

Secondcurve....

You are a bit out of line calling the Weirs a dump! I did miss in the article where the property had already been appraised. If tis appraised at $480 then the city needs to get as close as they can to that. It still boils down to what someone is willing to pay. Lots of properties appraise higher than the selling price for a variety of reasons. (Although $150K off is a bit much). The city needs to deal with Lakeport and Irwin's in good faith. It needs to be an open process. The city cannot show favoritism either way...

Woodsy

meredith weekender 05-28-2015 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsy (Post 245633)
Weekender...

Yes Irwins pays taxes... but where will the $$$ come from if Lakeport goes under?

Secondcurve....

You are a bit out of line calling the Weirs a dump! I did miss in the article where the property had already been appraised. If tis appraised at $480 then the city needs to get as close as they can to that. It still boils down to what someone is willing to pay. Lots of properties appraise higher than the selling price for a variety of reasons. (Although $150K off is a bit much). The city needs to deal with Lakeport and Irwin's in good faith. It needs to be an open process. The city cannot show favoritism either way...

Woodsy



Woodsy, It is highly unlikely that Lakeport would go out due to losing their current showroom and display area. If for some reason they did go out, I am sure that any of the successful marinas and boat storage facilities would be interested in in their properties as there is only limited areas for docking and storage on the lake.

BroadHopper 05-28-2015 02:28 PM

it will be a tough battle for the marina
 
Brenda Baer is known to be anti-boater. Supports the speed limits and turned down a proposal for a public dock in the Lakeport area that was proposed and OK by the 1953 city council.

She usually do not answer my calls and emails so I would not see an 'honest solution to the problem.

Misha888 05-28-2015 10:44 PM

IN reality . . .
 
if either parties need to go the bank, the bank will decide on its value based on income (capitalization rate). I'm certain both parties have accountants who have done the math and know how much cash they have on hand for such a transaction. If current tenant gets those two extra years, they have the advantage . . . and I could go on.

secondcurve 05-29-2015 05:34 AM

Secondcurve....

You are a bit out of line calling the Weirs a dump!

Woodsy[/QUOTE]

Sorry. Perhaps a bit harsh but it is frustrating to see the city leaders unable to stop the downward spiral of the area. I remember what it was and it has been a long painful slide.

BroadHopper 05-29-2015 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misha888 (Post 245681)
if either parties need to go the bank, the bank will decide on its value based on income (capitalization rate). I'm certain both parties have accountants who have done the math and know how much cash they have on hand for such a transaction. If current tenant gets those two extra years, they have the advantage . . . and I could go on.

I don't think the city council care less what the bank believe the value of the property is or how much capital a business can raise. Whatever the appraised value is, someone has the cash, even if its the syndicate and they will take the money. Good example is state surplus land such as Laconia State School, the politicians want millions for land that has been appraised for far less. Meanwhile the buildings are rotting away. :(

Woodsy 05-29-2015 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by secondcurve (Post 245686)
Secondcurve....

You are a bit out of line calling the Weirs a dump!

Woodsy

Sorry. Perhaps a bit harsh but it is frustrating to see the city leaders unable to stop the downward spiral of the area. I remember what it was and it has been a long painful slide.[/QUOTE]

That's not calling it a DUMP! :) I live in the Weirs, I love it there. And to be truthful there are really cool bright spots right now....

They have cleaned up the old saloon lot... prob paving it today

Christmas Island is not only reopening, but they are spending tons of money on upgrades...

Nothin Fancy opened a bar & Grille with a deck on Weirs Blvd

Faro seems to be knocking it out of the park businesswise...

All wee need to do is get some re-investment $$$ on Lakeside ave....


Woodsy

PaugusBayFireFighter 05-29-2015 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsy (Post 245699)
Sorry. Perhaps a bit harsh but it is frustrating to see the city leaders unable to stop the downward spiral of the area. I remember what it was and it has been a long painful slide.

That's not calling it a DUMP! :) I live in the Weirs, I love it there. And to be truthful there are really cool bright spots right now....

They have cleaned up the old saloon lot... prob paving it today

Christmas Island is not only reopening, but they are spending tons of money on upgrades...

Nothin Fancy opened a bar & Grille with a deck on Weirs Blvd

Faro seems to be knocking it out of the park businesswise...

All wee need to do is get some re-investment $$$ on Lakeside ave....


Woodsy[/QUOTE]

And the business owners along Weirs Blvd. spoke up and squashed proposed zoning that would have prevented any new business in the area. Hopefully this trend continues. Langley Cove will have 290 new homes very soon.
Progress.

SIKSUKR 05-29-2015 09:35 AM

I know its part of the lease agreement but its seems weird to have to pay again for a building you built.

Smokienorm 05-29-2015 09:47 AM

Lakeport Landing
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 245531)
Is this the person that had an 'event' that eventually led to the creating of a speed limit on the lake? Or am I mistaken? I'm not a local.

A "horrific accident" is an understatement. One person was killed and another severely injured in the incident- the press reported that the driver was DWI and got off very lightly in the criminal justice system. But that's a story for another day.

Smokienorm 05-29-2015 10:12 AM

Land Lease Customs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SIKSUKR (Post 245713)
I know its part of the lease agreement but its seems weird to have to pay again for a building you built.

It is very common (based on 40+ years of real estate law practice) for a land lease to provide that anything built on the land during the term of the lease becomes the property of the land owner when the lease term expires. Otherwise, the tenant might be required to remove, at the tenant's expense (which could be substantial), anything that was built on the land and restore the land to its condition at the beginning of the lease.

secondcurve 05-29-2015 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIKSUKR (Post 245713)
I know its part of the lease agreement but its seems weird to have to pay again for a building you built.

It all depends on what the lease payments have been for the past 30 years. This information is notably absent. My guess is the payments have been below market. Thus, the marina may still be ahead even if they have to tear down the building in the end.

Misha888 05-29-2015 06:25 PM

Fully understand . . .
 
just basing my comment on reality. If rent only makes a commercial piece of property a certain value they could be sitting on it for a while, I assume.

From my experience with the town of Laconia and what I've read over the past 10 years, it's all about the quick buck even if you have been a business owner for decades.

The State of NH purchased the marina behind marine patrol for $1.1 maybe that guy can go buy that land and re-establish his business with his windfall. The church in Laconia sold for $280k (or something close) far less than "town appraised" value.



Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 245695)
I don't think the city council care less what the bank believe the value of the property is or how much capital a business can raise. Whatever the appraised value is, someone has the cash, even if its the syndicate and they will take the money. Good example is state surplus land such as Laconia State School, the politicians want millions for land that has been appraised for far less. Meanwhile the buildings are rotting away. :(


SIKSUKR 05-30-2015 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by secondcurve (Post 245754)
It all depends on what the lease payments have been for the past 30 years. This information is notably absent. My guess is the payments have been below market. Thus, the marina may still be ahead even if they have to tear down the building in the end.

I totally understand the lease agreement and have no issue.With my commercial property some tenants do many costly imrovement worth 10's to even $100,000 dollars worth.Those stay with my building.It would be odd to have them pay for that again if they purchased that space but thats how it works.

MeredithMan 06-09-2015 07:49 AM

Irwin wins the prize....
 
From today's Citizen.....

LACONIA — After more than eight months of attempting to reach a consensus about what to do with the Lakeport Landing Marina property at 21 Elm. St., the Laconia City Council has agreed to sell the site to Irwin Marine.

Coming out of a nonpublic session in which councilors discussed offers received for the .81 acre parcel and 9,000-square-foot showroom at the site, Mayor Edward Engler said that bids were received and unsealed Monday evening.

The first bid was $331,400 from Lakeport Landing Marina owner Erica Blizzard and she asked the city to defer taking any action on the matter until July so a second appraisal of the property could be conducted.

The second bid was by Irwin Marine and was for $528,000.

In May, the Capital Appraisal Company of Concord valued the property and existing building at $480,000.

The city originally bought the strip of land from the Boston Maine Railroad in 1958 and then sold the property to Lakeport Landing Marina in the mid-1980s. But that purchase agreement was nullified by the New Hampshire Supreme Court after a series of lawsuits filed by Irwin Marine claiming fair and open bidding on the property had not been followed.

Following the Supreme Court's guidance and approval under the terms of settling the lawsuits, the city signed a 10-year lease with the business, which was renewed for 10 years in 1995 and again for 10 years in 2005.

However, under the terms of lease approved by the New Hampshire Supreme Court, the original lease could not be extended beyond the 30-year point and Lakeport Landing Marina's current lease expires Nov. 1.

Councilors voted unanimously in February to declare the property as surplus, opening the door to a potential sale.

Mayor Edward Engler said both bids contained provisions agreeing to allow the city an easement for inspection and repair of a retaining wall adjacent to the property along Union Avenue, granting the city access to public parking space close to Elm Street, to retain the existing building on the site so the city would not lose taxable value and if the property was sold to any party other than Lakeport Landing Marina, the business would not have to relocate for two years.

Ward 3 Councilor Henry Lipman made a motion to accept the offer to sell the property to Irwin Marine and instruct City Manager Scott Myers to finalize the agreement.

By a vote of 4-2, the council voted to sell the site and building to Irwin Marine.

Councilors Ava Doyle, David Bownes, Robert Hamel and Lipman voted for the motion, with Councilor Brenda Baer and Armand Bolduc voting against it.

Prior to the meeting, Rod Dyer, former Laconia mayor and the attorney representing Erica Blizzard, shared a letter he sent last week to the city manager and city councilors about why the city should sell the site to Blizzard.

In the letter, he said that through the years since Lakeport Landing Marina has been on the property, it has rendered to Laconia rental payments, tax payments and improvements of more than $560,000.

"That investment in the premises is now on the verge of being lost as the city considers whether 'fairness' requires wiping the slate clean and viewing both interested parties as identical, event though one has invested literally hundreds of thousands of dollars into the property and the other has invested nothing," Dyer wrote in his letter.

Baer said she was dejected by the outcome of the situation.

"I've been beaten many times, but tonight I am truly disappointed," she said.

Bolduc said he agreed with Baer.

"I still say I'm disappointed, but we'll have to live with it," he said

codeman671 06-09-2015 08:15 AM

She should have ponied up... Can't feel bad about this. Irwin stepped up big time over her number.

LIforrelaxin 06-09-2015 08:36 AM

I agree with Codeman.... LakePort Landing had 30 years to figure this out, with the city... the lease ended and it was time to pay the piper...

I continue to wonder financially how well LakePort Landing is really doing....

While I agree with Woodsy that it would be a lose for the community... maybe it is time for some new blood in the Marina industry around the lake.

fatlazyless 06-09-2015 08:37 AM

So's .....what will Irwin's do with their new, high-visibilty addition.....will it be used for more boats.....or will it be used for pwc's, sno-mos, and maybe atv's? Maybe a canoe and kayak center.....no? .....hmmmm....probably not?

Oh well.....wait & see .... 24-months from now? Will Irwin Marine still be there ..... very similar to today......in the year 2065 when everyone is about 120-years old and still boating ...... ho-ho-ho?

thinkxingu 06-09-2015 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by codeman671 (Post 246447)
She should have ponied up... Can't feel bad about this. Irwin stepped up big time over her number.

Yes, but in my mind some of the money invested in the property should have been taken into consideration. Sometimes it's not just about the money.

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.