Winnipesaukee Forum

Winnipesaukee Forum (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   WOW Trail Phase 3 Heating up... (https://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21945)

Paugus 08-12-2017 08:47 AM

State says lawsuit is premature
 
Looks like the State isn't biting on this lawsuit.
http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...suit-premature

jetskier 08-12-2017 06:44 PM

Not the case
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 283715)
Looks like the State isn't biting on this lawsuit.
http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...suit-premature

Not the case....

The WOW Org has been saying that they would be filing plans by the fall for Phase III. Now they are saying that it might be 4 or 5 years before they file plans. That is what they told DOT. The litigation was filed based upon the view that the WOW Org would imminently be filing plans with the city - that is what they publicly said.

DOT had to respond to the SD/LB petition by 8/11/17 and they requested an extension of 30 days. SD/LB agreed to this extension. DOT's concern is whether the action is premature since now the WOW Org is saying that it is going to be years (a different story than a few months ago). So, fundamentally no action has been taken by either side. SD/LB have the right to proceed to court and DOT has the right to determine whether they want to settle this by not granting permission to the WOW Org. If the litigation is delayed, it is just that. It will be simply be put aside until things progress...if that is the decision. The basis of the litigation stands.

It is clear that the article in the Laconia Daily Sun was focusing on a position that there was a motion to dismiss and that is simply not the case. The litigation is currently still very much in effect. Of course SD/LB does not want to waste state resources if the WOW Org is 4 or 5 years away from filing plans.

Fundamentally, the route along the frontage does not make sense and the WOW Org would be well served to focus on one of the alternative routes that have been proposed. It would be less expensive, less intrusive and could be built more quickly than the route along the frontage. Tavern 27 has even offered land for a welcome center and parking.

Just my 2 cents.

Jetskier

:cool:

joey2665 08-12-2017 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetskier (Post 283726)
Not the case....

The WOW Org has been saying that they would be filing plans by the fall for Phase III. Now they are saying that it might be 4 or 5 years before they file plans. That is what they told DOT. The litigation was filed based upon the view that the WOW Org would imminently be filing plans with the city - that is what they publicly said.

DOT had to respond to the SD/LB petition by 8/11/17 and they requested an extension of 30 days. SD/LB agreed to this extension. DOT's concern is whether the action is premature since now the WOW Org is saying that it is going to be years (a different story than a few months ago). So, fundamentally no action has been taken by either side. SD/LB have the right to proceed to court and DOT has the right to determine whether they want to settle this by not granting permission to the WOW Org. If the litigation is delayed, it is just that. It will be simply be put aside until things progress...if that is the decision. The basis of the litigation stands.

It is clear that the article in the Laconia Daily Sun was focusing on a position that there was a motion to dismiss and that is simply not the case. The litigation is currently still very much in effect. Of course SD/LB does not want to waste state resources if the WOW Org is 4 or 5 years away from filing plans.

Fundamentally, the route along the frontage does not make sense and the WOW Org would be well served to focus on one of the alternative routes that have been proposed. It would be less expensive, less intrusive and could be built more quickly than the route along the frontage. Tavern 27 has even offered land for a welcome center and parking.

Just my 2 cents.

Jetskier

:cool:

You are forgetting one key item. If the trail is re routed away from the railroad ROW then the federal funding disappears.

jetskier 08-12-2017 10:33 PM

Not at all
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joey2665 (Post 283740)
You are forgetting one key item. If the trail is re routed away from the railroad ROW then the federal funding disappears.

Not at all....
  • The cost to build the trail along the frontage will be much much higher than any of the the alternate routes.
  • With the current administration, money for secondary transportation infrastructure is being redirected to primary transportation infrastructure and it is unlikely that it will be as available in the past.

So, let's look at Phase II economics:

$400k came from the of Laconia (beautification fund)
$500k came from federal grants
$100k came from fund raising

Phase III is purported to cost $10M (my analysis with bridges etc is actually more like $15M to $20M).

The city of Laconia (I am told) does not have money to donate with all the other projects and commitments. So, that would mean:

$4M federal grant (pro rata, if available)
$6M - $16M to be raised

If the trail goes along one of the alternate routes the cost is only a fraction as there are no bridges to build, fences to separate the train from the pedestrians, trestle bridge issues etc... The route along the frontage is fraught with issues and associated costs...

Jetskier :cool:

joey2665 08-12-2017 10:41 PM

Sorry I completely disagree. The alternative plans do not eliminate all the bridges only one and no matter the route the federal funding is absolutely needed. All of the routes contain many obstacles it is certainly not as easy as your making it sound.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

Outdoorsman 08-13-2017 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jetskier (Post 283726)

Fundamentally, the route along the frontage does not make sense and the WOW Org would be well served to focus on one of the alternative routes that have been proposed. It would be less expensive, less intrusive and could be built more quickly than the route along the frontage. Tavern 27 has even offered land for a welcome center and parking.

Just my 2 cents.

Jetskier

:cool:

It is always nice to see how GREEDY people think. You do NOT own the state ROW.

Go bully some other state/city/town

beantownbaby 08-13-2017 07:15 PM

^ haters gonna hate

jetskier 08-13-2017 07:53 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by joey2665 (Post 283743)
Sorry I completely disagree. The alternative plans do not eliminate all the bridges only one and no matter the route the federal funding is absolutely needed. All of the routes contain many obstacles it is certainly not as easy as your making it sound.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app

Actually, there are two to three bridges of consequence on the frontage route. There is a small one at SD, which is not of significant interest. The two big ones are Chattle Cove and Pickerel Cove. The required bridges would be approximately 1,000 ft and 800 ft in length....and how do you deal with the trestle at the Weirs? There is no room for a train and a trail there.

I have been on the snowmobile trails through the woods and reviewed the maps....nothing onerous.

Jetskier :cool:

joey2665 08-13-2017 08:30 PM

Jetskier
 
Jetskier your views are extremely clouded by the fact that you are a south down resident and do not want the trail through the community. Conveniently forgetting the fact that the trail and ROW were all agreed to in the original community plan. Yes I am a former Long Bay resident, yes as long as it is constructed properly and is esthetically pleasing I am all for the trail and finally yes I do currently have ownership interest is south down property. It is also my opinion that long term the trail will have a substantial positive impact not only Laconia but all the communities along the trail.

jetskier 08-13-2017 09:11 PM

Just stating facts...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joey2665 (Post 283785)
Jetskier your views are extremely clouded by the fact that you are a south down resident and do not want the trail through the community. Conveniently forgetting the fact that the trail and ROW were all agreed to in the original community plan. Yes I am a former Long Bay resident, yes as long as it is constructed properly and is esthetically pleasing I am all for the trail and finally yes I do currently have ownership interest is south down property. It is also my opinion that long term the trail will have a substantial positive impact not only Laconia but all the communities along the trail.


I think that this discussion has reached larger heads...I am just presenting the facts. I have no control over what the WOW Org decides to do...and you now live in Meredith Bay not South Down. You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. I would suggest that we simply leave it at that.

Jetskier :cool:

Paugus 08-14-2017 02:29 PM

Thank you, Jetskier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jetskier (Post 283742)
Not at all....

So, let's look at Phase II economics:

$400k came from the of Laconia (beautification fund)
$500k came from federal grants
$100k came from fund raising

Jetskier :cool:

Thank you for providing us with these facts, Jetskier. I remember reading about NH CDFA tax credits (https://patch.com/new-hampshire/conc...ty-development), Downtown Tax Increment Financing funding (http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...o-city-council) and private fundraising, but not anything about a beautification fund and federal grants.

Could this $400,000 in beautification money from Laconia and $500,000 in federal grant money you mention be reserved for Phase 3 and the pending lawsuit?

jetskier 08-14-2017 05:45 PM

Phase II funding info
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 283843)
Thank you for providing us with these facts, Jetskier. I remember reading about NH CDFA tax credits (https://patch.com/new-hampshire/conc...ty-development), Downtown Tax Increment Financing funding (http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...o-city-council) and private fundraising, but not anything about a beautification fund and federal grants.

Could this $400,000 in beautification money from Laconia and $500,000 in federal grant money you mention be reserved for Phase 3 and the pending lawsuit?

Hi Paugus,

My understanding is that the $400k donated by the city came from the TIF loans (you have a link in your email which describes the $400k for phase II). I have been told that the money was placed in the budget under "beautification" of down town which is consistent with the projects listed in the linked article. I have talked to a couple of teachers who are upset about the expenditure based upon the lack of money for teacher's salaries; however, I don't know that the money would have been able to be reallocated to other purposes. It is a loan and has to be paid back by the city, so at some level, it affects the city budget as a debt service....read not free money.

The $500k came from a federal grant...All of the money was spent on Phase II (total construction cost of $1M). The federal grant is essentially free money. Private fundraising provided $100k of the costs. The WOW Org is a 501c nonprofit and their financials are public record. Their EIN number is 45-0509781 if you want to look at 990s or other records.

Hope this helps.

Jetskier :cool:

Paugus 08-14-2017 08:36 PM

Federal grants?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jetskier (Post 283849)

The $500k came from a federal grant...All of the money was spent on Phase II (total construction cost of $1M). The federal grant is essentially free money. Private fundraising provided $100k of the costs. The WOW Org is a 501c nonprofit and their financials are public record. Their EIN number is 45-0509781 if you want to look at 990s or other records.

Hope this helps.

Jetskier :cool:

With all due respect, Jetskier, I like to be able to cite my facts and I haven't been able to track down info anywhere on this $500,000 federal grant you talk about. Will you please link the source so that we can all learn more about this type of federal funding the WOW Trail used? All of the info I can find lists the city TIF funds, NH CDFA tax credits, and private funding. Thanks in advance. Sorry to be a pain.

jetskier 08-14-2017 09:19 PM

WOW Trail Federal Grant Information
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 283855)
With all due respect, Jetskier, I like to be able to cite my facts and I haven't been able to track down info anywhere on this $500,000 federal grant you talk about. Will you please link the source so that we can all learn more about this type of federal funding the WOW Trail used? All of the info I can find lists the city TIF funds, NH CDFA tax credits, and private funding. Thanks in advance. Sorry to be a pain.

Hi Paugus,

Look at line #3 of the 2015 balance sheet (attached) is for Phase II. There was a grant of about $61k for Phase I. The grant number is H33C22A000349 and you can find information at this link:

https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/Ad...?k=WOW%20Trail

Incidentally, you are by no means a pain...nice to have a factual interaction. :D

Jetskier :cool:

Paugus 08-14-2017 10:15 PM

Hmmmm...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jetskier (Post 283858)
Hi Paugus,

Look at line #3 of the 2015 balance sheet (attached) is for Phase II. There was a grant of about $61k for Phase I. The grant number is H33C22A000349 and you can find information at this link:

https://www.usaspending.gov/Pages/Ad...?k=WOW%20Trail

Incidentally, you are by no means a pain...nice to have a factual interaction. :D

Jetskier :cool:

Jetskier, Thanks for the link but that grant number you provided (H33C22A000349) and all of the others listed on that usaspending.gov link are for Phase 1.
"Project Description
LACONIA; WOW TRAIL PH 1; CONSTRUCT 7040' (Segments 7-10) SHARED USE PATH IN RR CORRIDOR FROM MAIN ST TO ELM ST; [04-28TE]"

As I recall, Phase 1 was built in 2010, which makes sense given the dates of the federal grants your link mentions. I still can't find anything about a federal grant for Phase 2.

jetskier 08-15-2017 11:28 AM

Actually not
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 283864)
Jetskier, Thanks for the link but that grant number you provided (H33C22A000349) and all of the others listed on that usaspending.gov link are for Phase 1.
"Project Description
LACONIA; WOW TRAIL PH 1; CONSTRUCT 7040' (Segments 7-10) SHARED USE PATH IN RR CORRIDOR FROM MAIN ST TO ELM ST; [04-28TE]"

As I recall, Phase 1 was built in 2010, which makes sense given the dates of the federal grants your link mentions. I still can't find anything about a federal grant for Phase 2.

The grant was given during the Phase I period and covers both phases. The Phase I draw down was $61k which is in the WOW Org financials. The Phase II draw down was $500k (2015 financials). That is why I posted the 2015 financials.

Jetskier :cool:

Paugus 08-31-2017 05:15 PM

Rusty McLear weighs in on WOW Trail
 
Anyone else see this?

http://www.laconiadailysun.com/speci...e-lakes-region

Major 09-01-2017 10:16 AM

WOW Trail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 285013)

Yes. He wants to purchase the Hobo Railroad and shut it down in favor of the WOW trail. You notice that he didn't come right out and say this. I had a laugh out loud moment when I read the sentence about the "transportation corridor." Yeah, like people from Laconia and Weirs are going to take the WOW trail to conduct business in Meredith! What a joke. Like I said, I'd rather he come right out and state his intentions, rather than obfuscate it under the guise of let's study the matter.

BroadHopper 09-01-2017 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 285013)

So South Down/Long Bay folks are going to boycott McLear's business?

Major 09-01-2017 03:21 PM

WOW Trail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BroadHopper (Post 285045)
So South Down/Long Bay folks are going to boycott McLear's business?

Since most of us own homes in SD/LB, we wouldn't have the need to stay at Mr. MeLear's hotels. Personally speaking, I don't go to Patrick's.

Paugus 10-17-2017 04:09 PM

Lawsuit Over WOW Trail Withdrawn
 
It's unfortunate that SD/LB had to pay legal fees for this lawsuit that their attorney now says is premature. Why didn't someone check to see if the WOW Trail filed formal plans before paying an attorney to file a lawsuit?

http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...n-as-premature

Major 10-17-2017 04:41 PM

WOW Trail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paugus (Post 286755)
It's unfortunate that SD/LB had to pay legal fees for this lawsuit that their attorney now says is premature. Why didn't someone check to see if the WOW Trail filed formal plans before paying an attorney to file a lawsuit?

http://www.laconiadailysun.com/newsx...n-as-premature

There was a lot of activity by the organizers of the WOW Trail that would lead reasonable people to believe that the submission of a plan was imminent. Only through a deposition of the WOW Trail representative was it learned that the organizers weren't close to implementing Phase III. This is NOT a big deal. Lawsuits are routinely filed and withdrawn for a variety of reasons. The present lawsuit was withdrawn without prejudice, which means that SD/LB can re-file at any time. There isn't a lot of waste, since the lawsuit is teed up and ready to file at a moment's notice. Short money in the long run.

As an aside, I was happy to read that there is little or no money for Phase III. It's going to take a lot of money to implement, so this is good news for those of us who do not want to see Phase III constructed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.