View Single Post
Old 08-12-2009, 11:57 AM   #8
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,941
Thanks: 2,213
Thanked 778 Times in 554 Posts
Thumbs up You Left Out "Winni", but It's OK To Try Again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfeboro_Baja View Post
"...It may be useful at some point to know the total breakdown, i.e., GF owners that support SL's, GF owners that oppose SL's, all others that support SL's and all others that oppose SL's..."
This is very telling:

1) Among my eight boats owned last year, only two—maybe three—could have broken the night limit. Are we to ignore the night limit? And only approve of a return to unlimited speeds?

2) Of those eight boats, none are what I'd call "Loud". (As in GFBL).

3) For those "Non-Loud" boats, why not set a weight limit instead? Use a "base weight" of a small GFB/GFBL?

Use the weight of a DONZI "Classic", for example?

After all, it is the combined speed and weight that can dangerously affect those lesser, but "medium-sized" boats out there.

(And cottages!)
__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline