Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308
Hmmm, interesting. So liquor policies should be made different based on someones winter or summer sport of choice??? How about skiers should it be different for them, after all they would be a danger to someone else on the slopes correct?? What about skydivers, kayakers, etc, etc?? Where does it end?
Sorry Vita, but I respectfully disagree with this type of discriminatory policing. Whats good for one is good for all plain and simple. I have my own personal limits when riding which are well within the legal boundaries and I certainly don't need someone telling me that because I ride a snowmobile or motorcycle I will be more watched than others!
Whatever happened to self policing and personal responsibilty... Oh yeah thats right they went out the window with the old America.
Dan
|
Dan,
I am not saying that there should be a law, rule or any other binding agreement. I am fine with .08 (but my Class A CDL is .02, discriminatory?) as the law.
We are talking about a restaurant's policy. The establishment needs to protect itself. We lose snowmobilers virtually every year over here (near Green's Basin), the last ones had recently left a local establishment. This is where personal responsibility seems to end because lawsuits are the result and blame is spread to the establishment and server.
I consider myself to be a civil libertarian, I don't think more laws will solve anything. In this case, I have to put myself in the Owner's or Bartender's shoes- they are the ultimate arbitrar of who gets served. If I think they are too tight on their policy, I get to vote with my feet.