View Single Post
Old 01-24-2010, 09:48 AM   #12
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,911
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,051 Times in 765 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
And at the same time, there's a 14% increase in the contribution to state retirement funds.

I believe that last June 2009 the state legislature passed a rule attached to a new law that will lower state aid from 35% to 25%. Over the next three years, state contributions to cities & towns for their employee pensions will decline from 35 to 30 to 25%. Maybe, that is what's driving this 14% Meredith pension cost increase?

One thing that I do not understand; the state has no say what-so-ever how much cities & towns pay their employees, so why should the state be responsible for paying 35% of their pension costs?
__________________
.... Banned for life from local thrift store!

Last edited by fatlazyless; 01-24-2010 at 08:35 PM.
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote