Quote:
Originally Posted by sa meredith
See???? "...ridiculous blathering...." Now you're getting the hang of this thread. Glad I could help.
As an aside, for such a learned man, I ask....what does "witt" possess, in your previous sentence? The 's implies ownership. Is it possible you were looking for the plural? That would be "witts", my man. Read a paper...good practice.
That's (that is) it for me. You can have the last laugh.
I'm probably flirting with moderation from Don at this point...and I don't enjoy being in the penalty box.
|
Reread my post. I think you will clearly see that I did say "witt's".
Quote:
Originally Posted by sa meredith
That's (that is) it for me.
|
One can only hope.