View Single Post
Old 01-25-2011, 05:36 AM   #9
jniff101
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moultonboro
Posts: 113
Thanks: 23
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heaven View Post
I think I've got the reason for the additional charge.
Sometime after the original trial the prosecutor learned that this was the third incident Ward Bird had been involved in that showed (at the very least) poor judgement when armed.
She believed he should be disarmed for life, and this was the charge that would do it.
If they took past incidents with Ward into account then why did they dismiss all the past incidents with the women. That is just ridiculous! Free Ward Bird and give his kids their father back!
jniff101 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to jniff101 For This Useful Post: