Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things
No, I don't think it means they can't be designed to be pervious. The change seems to be "stylistic" and does not seem change the actual meaning of the term.
|
Agreed, I think that is a case of removing some misguided verbiage, which probably lead to a great deal of controversy with developers trying to claim that what they where doing was pervious, to get around things. Claiming to be pervious, and actually being pervious are two different things, depending on what the absorption rate needs to be.