Thread: Envirowhat???
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2005, 10:10 PM   #20
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,971
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 783 Times in 559 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiofn
Acres, why not post the replies to that post where we all said that guy was a jerk for doing that?
Because only one spoke up of 90 GFBL posts. We?

The site to which you refer has been "alternatively-described" below, but you know the drill:
http//www.theusualGFBL.often-obscene.site.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99009.
.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Audiofn
"...Just because we drive what is available to us in todays technology does not mean that we do not like the environment. We are all looking for the better mouse trap."
Sorry, Audiofn and DoftheMattysort, "we're" not.

The technology is already here.

Toyota makes a car that has sold over 100,000 cars in the US, gets 60+MPG, and reduces carcinogens by 95%! (See Wired.com) Honda makes a 255HP V-6 low-emission car that gets 30+MPG -- average overall.

But the technology to make excess power and excess noise on Winnipesaukee requires an over-rich mixture. (For stoichiometrics, to meet programmed chip performance parameters, cooling and other reasons). Also, the use of aviation fuel, the supplemental addition of lead to the gasoline -- and even oil products from endangered whales!

Over-rich mixtures are over-rich in PAHs, particulates, hydrocarbons, NOX, CO2, CO... (ITD has already covered this here -- and he's absolutely right).

Especially bad for asthmatics, but shouldn't be inhaled in any case -- by anybody.

The "better mousetrap" is already here. But it is ignored -- for Thrills.

Here's Lake Winnipesaukee eight inches below summer's low lake level.

Explain it:
Attached Images
 

Last edited by ApS; 04-14-2005 at 10:17 AM.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote