View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 09:52 AM   #21
lawn psycho
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: On the move...
Posts: 987
Thanks: 113
Thanked 248 Times in 133 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argie's Wife View Post
Perhaps. But there can be waivers granted and some things can be grandfathered so they don't have to comply. (I've seen that with some building code)...

As far as cars go... your suggestion is a good one - get a patent on it.

We don't need them as fuel tanks are designed to minimze risk of fire and explosion during collisions. Many cars kill the ignition of airbags are deployed. My point is better design of the system itself to minimize the risk of fire in the first place is always better than a reactionary system.

I do support in-home sprinklers on newer homes however.
lawn psycho is offline   Reply With Quote