Thread: No Wake Again ?
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2005, 05:16 PM   #15
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
Post Wake liability....

Hi Silver duck,

I think we both know you are waiting in vain, there is no specific statute referencing wake damage directly. However, if intent can be shown, a charge of reckless operation should apply:

TITLE XXII
NAVIGATION; HARBORS; COAST SURVEY
CHAPTER 270
SUPERVISION OF NAVIGATION; REGISTRATION OF BOATS AND MOTORS; COMMON CARRIERS BY WATER
Operation of Boats
Section 270:29-a
270:29-a Careless and Negligent Operation of Boats. – Any person who shall operate a power boat upon any waters of the state in a careless and negligent manner or so that the lives and safety of the public are endangered shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Source. 1981, 353:12, eff. Aug. 22, 1981.


Since this charge is a misdemenanor, intent & culpable state of mind have to be proven by the prosecutor.

If the damage is strictly property related, civil damages can always be pursued in Court.

However, as I posted elsewhere, this month's issue of BoatUS Seaworthy magazine shows that common sense applies to both parties. In a case cited, a large ship producing a large wake was not liable for damages to an anchored vessel because the court felt that the anchored vessel did not take in to proper consideration its location to a known shipping lane.

Once you get in Court, all bets are off!

Hope this helps,

Skip
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote