Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

Bear Islander · 08-08-2005, 02:57 PM

SIKSUKR

The pictures are not staged in any way, they are regular BearCam images. I was 100 miles away when the second one was taken. However that is my boat.

I posted the pictures as a response to the suggestion from Mee-n-Mac that I set up a camera to catch 150' rule violations. I do have the BearCam set up that can do just that. The irony of it is that the first boat I caught was my own! A copy of that picture was presented to the operator, but that is a different story.

The PWC was going about 20 mph, to fast for that close to my dock.

99% of the problem with boats coming to close was solved a few years back when my neighbor and I put out our moorings. It's only $25 per year and you can also use them to tie up a boat. The remaining 1% of the problem are total morons that nothing but a granite breakwater will stop. On second thought it would probably just get them airborne.

08-08-2005, 02:57 PM	#56
Bear Islander Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Bear Island Posts: 1,764 Thanks: 32 Thanked 441 Times in 207 Posts	SIKSUKR The pictures are not staged in any way, they are regular BearCam images. I was 100 miles away when the second one was taken. However that is my boat. I posted the pictures as a response to the suggestion from Mee-n-Mac that I set up a camera to catch 150' rule violations. I do have the BearCam set up that can do just that. The irony of it is that the first boat I caught was my own! A copy of that picture was presented to the operator, but that is a different story. The PWC was going about 20 mph, to fast for that close to my dock. 99% of the problem with boats coming to close was solved a few years back when my neighbor and I put out our moorings. It's only $25 per year and you can also use them to tie up a boat. The remaining 1% of the problem are total morons that nothing but a granite breakwater will stop. On second thought it would probably just get them airborne.