Quote:
Originally Posted by ripley
I am not making any statements .I am just telling you what I read in the Newspapers I looked up.
Now ,while I am sure it is more complicated than what I have just written and that perhaps many legal wrangelings have taken place since the documents I read were first published , a few of the names might provide a clue as to why waldos sits empty 2-3 years later..I don't know the answers ,,,,only more questions that no one wants to answer ..
So i think it may sit empty for a little while longer .I think this simply gives us more questions than we had before and fewer and fewer answers...I hope what I read was incorrect
|
I feel that there is a difference between VitaBene's posts and the partial quote of Ripley shown above .
Ripley clearly states that his posting is opinion and that the posting leaves many questions. VitaBene's posts have been written as if they are factual, when clearly they are not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
Sorry TT, but you decided to quote me (5 months later) as an example of speculation on this thread while ignoring the real speculation about involvement with the Farah's.
I posted my opinion. I stand by it and the comments about the viability of that site for a restaurant. I write that as someone who enjoyed many meals at WP and who liked the owners and respected them.
I will continue to post my opinions and speculate on this forum website. Best of luck with your real estate empire. Bike Week is coming  |
While you acknowledge that you write as an occasional diner at that restaurant you criticize the location without any knowledge of buisness volume, monthly and daily traffic counts, and the terms of any lease.
I respect your right to post your opinions but please indicate that they are your opinions, especially when they are so factually incorrect. You have no idea what the volume and profitability of that restaurant has been, I do. In business discussions with previous tenants I have had access to the books and know what that site is capable of with the right tenant serving the right product. It is equally as good a physical location as Tamarak or maybe even Sawyers and only limited by the size of the building. So, as far as your opinion about the location, you are once again wrong and I will respectfully disagree with you.
And yes, the speculation about any involvement by me with the Farah's is also incorrect. I only know what I have read about the Farah's in the newspapers and wouldn'y know them if I tripped over them. The current lessee may have had some business dealings with them in the past but that is not my concern, or any of my business.
While factually correct, these are just my opinions and I post them as such!