Thread: Water Temp
View Single Post
Old 12-18-2013, 09:23 PM   #24
PaugusBayFireFighter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 837
Thanks: 361
Thanked 674 Times in 264 Posts
Default Glad you brought that up....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Thunder View Post
The water temp today is posted as 25 degrees. So by now everyone should be convinced that the water temps posted and commented on in this thread have been bogus for weeks if not months. If, in fact, the water temp was 25 degrees...the lake would be solid ice and a temp that low could not really be measured accurately. Just sayin....
Besides the obvious problem with the readings now at Lakeport Dam, where do you see anything to dismiss the earlier reported readings posted and commented on?

The temperature of 38 degrees on Nov. 15th was what you questioned. You said "I highly doubt the water temp is 38*....must be something wrong with the sensor. Its just too early for water temps that low."

Six days later on Nov. 21st, when Lakeport reported temps of 36 degrees, you said "Sorry PBFF. There's no way the lake is 36 degrees yet. It's just too early for those water temps to be accurate. Ice of any significance is at least a month away."

Now, knowing that ice started forming 2 weeks later, you still think the readings were bogus? It's not plausible that the lake could be 38 degrees on Nov. 15th and 35 degrees on the 28th with ice forming in the coves? What am I missing?

I agree the temps may be wrong at Lakeport now, but when you originally questioned my post I said that I confirmed the water temps by looking at my two dock thermometers, which are now under about 4 inches of solid ice, about a month earlier than last year.

The picture is looking across Paugus Bay at Lakeport where the temps are recorded. It appears to have "significant" ice, as does most of the lake.
http://www.rattlesnakecam.com/icein.htm
Attached Images
 

Last edited by PaugusBayFireFighter; 12-19-2013 at 10:35 AM.
PaugusBayFireFighter is offline   Reply With Quote