View Single Post
Old 02-18-2014, 07:50 AM   #18
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,944
Thanks: 544
Thanked 570 Times in 335 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
The govt takes over the infrastructure and lease it out to the service providers who can operate in all the markets. That should bring prices down and service up.
Name one thing "the government" has taken over recently (last 20 years) that's turned out well. I don't mean to turn this into a political discussion, but think about your statement for a minute...

The biggest part of your cable bill is essentially paying for the *content*. Metrocast (et al) have to pay for the channels brought into your house. The cable plant itself is costly to build, but maintenance is relatively cheap compared to other costs.

Changing ownership of the infrastructure isn't going to change your bill very much. If you want to rally for something, rally for a la carte programming, where you can pick and pay for only the channels YOU want to watch.
__________________
[insert witty phrase here]
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brk-lnt For This Useful Post: