View Single Post
Old 06-19-2015, 06:14 PM   #7
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,117
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 559 Times in 288 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by laketrout View Post
There is always room for compromise in this case between Irwin and Lakeport/Blizzard's but the deep pockets won out this time. However I do not the whole story
Why should there be a compromise? The city was selling a property and two parties were interested. One party bid modestly above the appraised value and the other party bid significantly below the appraised value? Given the difficult fiscal condition most cities and towns face today it is incumbent to maximize value where possible. If the selectman sold the property to the lower bidder that would be equivalent to stealing from the Laconia tax payers.
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to secondcurve For This Useful Post: