View Single Post
Old 12-21-2005, 01:32 AM   #12
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Default Still there for me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Lover
I guess you guys miss the point. The accident information is interesting but more importantly.....

1. The same people that are arguing here that safety is not an issue, are asking for the thread to be deleted or hidden. They don't want the truth about accidents to be known. If the truth is on your side...why hide the data!!!!!!!

2. Since I posted the link to that thread, 7 posts have been deleted from it. There were 32 posts when I gave the link, now there are 25. Once again they hide the truth. They are deleting their posts to cover up the cover up. Reminds me of Watergate.

All the posts (50) that were there earlier are still there right now. I just clicked on them. As to their motivations ... I care about them as much as I care about yours. Sombody's motivation doesn't matter to me. So do the accidents mentioned tell us something about HB-162 or not ? Am I, boating about in my 24' non-performance boat, likely to get smacked by someone going fast or by some drunk ? How much safer am I with HB-162 ? What makes 25/45 and not some other limits the correct numbers ? Is there any way to solve the "safety" problem other than HB-162 ?
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline