Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post - "Educating" those danged Winnipesaukee boaters

Bear Lover · 12-24-2005, 08:44 PM

There were many people, myself included, that believed 45 was to low and wanted something higher. But the opposition was into a "no limits" and "live free or die" thing and wouldn't even talk about it.

I remember somebody asking about 70 MPH and they were told NO!! Not 70 not 100 not 200.

A large number of HB162 supporters would have been just as happy or even happier with 60. Now HB162 is a shoe in that might not even be voted on. So now people want to talk about a higher more reasonable limit. I am honestly sorry about that, but I think it's to late.

12-24-2005, 08:44 PM	#130
Bear Lover Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 96 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	There were many people, myself included, that believed 45 was to low and wanted something higher. But the opposition was into a "no limits" and "live free or die" thing and wouldn't even talk about it. I remember somebody asking about 70 MPH and they were told NO!! Not 70 not 100 not 200. A large number of HB162 supporters would have been just as happy or even happier with 60. Now HB162 is a shoe in that might not even be voted on. So now people want to talk about a higher more reasonable limit. I am honestly sorry about that, but I think it's to late.