Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ITD
You said "both sides" agree, not two individuals from both sides, the posts are very clear, you spoke for everyone and now that you have been called on it you don't like it.
I wish you would explain and detail this so called evidence so I could elevate myself to the intellectual level at which you feel you exist. I'm always troubled by people who say if you only knew what I knew then you would understand, usually these people know nothing, maybe you're different.
You are very quick to dismiss the results that don't support your position while on the other hand had the results supported your position you would have fought tooth and nail to defend them even though the same questions would have existed. ( How did I know that? Truth is I don't but I figured I would state my theory on how you would have behaved as fact, just like you state your theories as fact.)
So, it is also very possible that nobody cheated and the results truly represent the public sentiment or a few knuckleheads cheated from each side offsetting each other. Once more, a call from another forum for people to come to this forum to vote, does not constitute cheating.
|
Yes, I said "both sides agree". It seems you want to pick apart every word of my post looking for a misstatement. So go ahead and declare victory on this point, it's not worth the argument. I should have said "representatives of both sides agree". And to answer you next question: Yes, in my opinion we are both qualified to call ourselves representatives.
The evidence was a screen shot from another site. In it a member admits, in fact boasts, at having two usernames on winnipesaukee.com. And that he used both names to vote no limits.
I will try and send you the image in a private message, if it doesn't work you could PM me an email address.