View Single Post
Old 02-09-2006, 03:50 PM   #4
Fat Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 183
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

WL,

Me thinks thou doth protest too much.

I won't get into the "Skip was not one of the original members" and "Winnilakers is not a go-fast group" debate...that was not my intention, and I think that everyone on this forum has already formed an opinion on just what NHRBA and Winnilakers are...we are not going to change that in this thread...either way. Skip is clearly more a part of your side of the general "go-fast be-loud" versus "quiet down-be safe" debate. Let's leave it at that.

But your participation in this discussion furthers my concern. So far, it is only the most avid HB162 opposers (who, BTW, all deny being GFBLers) that seem to want to see HB1624 pushed through under the cover of darkness. What's up with that? It would seem that the HB162 supporters would be the ones you'd expect to see pushing for HB1624 if it was truly going to result in queiter boats.

You have previously stated many times that we are all in favor of quieting down the loud boats. If HB1624 might just allow them to be louder, do you want to know that? Will you still support it? I'm not saying for sure that it would do that...but I certainly want to know...don't you? Let's discuss that instead of trying to guess how I know about your membership and questioning my identity (again with the identity thing?).
Let's get back to topic.
Fat Jack is offline