View Single Post
Old 04-29-2017, 08:17 PM   #15
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,941
Thanks: 2,213
Thanked 778 Times in 554 Posts
Exclamation 'Might Check...

Quote:
Originally Posted by depasseg View Post
I've read that ~30' from the leakage source provides a decent buffer in 15' deep water, but it depends on the amount of leakage and the depth of water (shallow water needs less buffer, deep water needs more).

I don't think touching the bottom really matters. The issue is that humans have less electrical resistance than freshwater so more current will flow through them than the water around them. The bigger problem from what I've read isn't the risk of actual electrocution from a large jolt of current, it's the risk of drowning due to paralysis from a smaller amount of current.

http://www.electricshockdrowning.org/esd--faq.html
https://www.mikeholt.com/mojonewsarc...s~20040826.php
We experienced that "smaller amount of current".

The cottage had been fitted with an inadequate copper grounding rod, and the current followed the water pipe "path" into the shallows. From about six feet away, as you waded towards the water pipe, you could increasingly feel the current. You would then feel your strength ebbing away!

New grounding rods advertise a 30-year service life.

.
__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ApS For This Useful Post: