View Single Post
Old 05-10-2017, 09:39 AM   #17
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,114
Thanks: 64
Thanked 749 Times in 483 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ishoot308 View Post
No disrespect taken and I do understand what you are saying. My point was a little tongue in cheek as many things from yesteryear that were thought to be safe or "the best choice" are now found to be extremely unsafe. Here is just a small list of what our government said was safe but was eventually pulled from the shelves due to serious side effects up to and including death!

http://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/...ourceID=005528

All one has to do is look at the TV ads by by the likes of James Sokolove and friends and look at all the lawsuits at the pharmaceutical companies and their drugs that had FDA approval just a few years ago and we now find they caused serious harm.

Why is this any different?? The local Government says its the best choice in 2017....what will they say in 2030??

I have nothing better to offer concerning the eradication of invasive weeds but that does not mean I shouldn't be concerned and simply trust all those knowledgeable government studies and highly educated people, these are the same people who approved the drugs in the link above.

Is it possible and OK for someone to remain highly skeptical without offering a better solution because that is where I am at, the solution is simply above my pay grade...I offer nothing but skepticism and doubt.

Dan
Well put.

The drug thalidomide comes to mind.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote