|  08-11-2022, 01:11 PM | #10 | 
	| Senior Member 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Gilford, NH / Welch Island 
					Posts: 6,367
				 Thanks: 2,422 
		
			
				Thanked 5,349 Times in 2,093 Posts
			
		
	      | 
 
			
			
	If you would of read my post thoroughly, I said, "not if he took the stand to testify on his own behalf". The prosecuting attorney could of brought up and used his prior offenses against him as a "pattern of behavior" tactic to help determine guilt just like they tried at the Kyle Rittenhouse trial... But like I said previously, I'm not sure and highly doubt he did testify considering the outcome!Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by John Mercier  Prior offenses would only be used for sentencing |  
 
	From what I have read and maybe misunderstood, the blood tests were thrown out for whatever reason...Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by John Mercier  The ''public'' doesn't decide the case... the jury does. It found him not guilty.Pretty sure that the jury had access to blood tests and accident reconstruction data.
 |  
 
No need to reply as I'm done on this...
 
Dan
		 
				__________________ 
				It's Always Sunny On Welch Island!!    | 
	|   |   |