View Single Post
Old 01-11-2024, 05:29 AM   #7
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,844
Thanks: 764
Thanked 1,474 Times in 1,029 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
They could possibly do it through RSA 270:12.
The restriction would be broader, but would affect the desire to operate in a ill-mannered approach in those areas.

Simply petition, for ''no wake'' within 300 feet of a shoreline.
You would need to go from water body to water body, but it could be done.

If 300 feet doesn't resolve the issue, go further.
It would have to be enforced. This certainly isn't:

No person shall operate a ski craft in a cove, as designated by the commissioner, or within 300 feet of shore, except as provided in paragraph VIII or pursuant to RSA 270:74-a, V. For the purpose of this paragraph "cove'' is defined as a bay or inlet which at its widest point does not exceed 1,000 linear feet. VIII.
tis is offline