Quote:
Originally Posted by retired
If you are getting paid, you are not a true volunteer, even if it is disguised as a stipend for "living expenses". Perhaps the real volunteers will continue to do the work. It sounds like the real loss of jobs might be the bureaucrats in Washington
|
It's fine with me if you think the government should cut AmeriCorps--that's a reasonable policy debate. Also a reasonable debate on implementation--this would make way more sense if they were planning in advance.
But let's not be cute or silly just to stir the political pot. Volunteers help out for a few hours at a time, when they feel like it, on projects they choose. AmeriCorps, regardless of what you call their roles, works full time, much harder than almost any volunteer, on pretty much whatever they're assigned. Even 50 typical volunteers could not replace 5 or 6 AmeriCorps people.