Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Airwaves
...You folks are ignoring one important statement. The person who was just thrown out of WAM, the one with the most immediate knowledge of the contract...
|
Hmmmm.....
Let me play the devil's advocate here.
How do we know that the individual making the complaint was ever even a customer at WAM?
Did you see the contract between the alleged customer and WAM. How do you, or we, know what it said or did not say?
Did you personally contact the good folks at WAM to verify the anonymous individual's claims before you posted the following:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Airwaves
...Based on that fact I will avoid doing business with them...
|
One important element that is necessary in a libel suit is evidence that a person's statement caused harm to the defendant. You, as a third party, have now publicly stated that you would avoid doing business with an entity due in part to public claims made by an alleged former customer.
A very slippery road to be on! And frankly I am surprised that someone with such an extensive media background as you profess would take such a profound public position without giving both sides the appropriate airing of their greivance.
Sadly the unfortunate "jumping to conclusions" mentality is something I am seeing all too often each night when I tune in the evening news. Objective journalism has been victimized for an ever increasing dependence on hype to ramp up sagging viewer ratings!
If ever there was a good example, this thread would suffice.
Skip