This kind of crap drives me crazy. Are their additional services that are being proposed that need a funding mechanism or is this just a way to allocate more of the tax burden to the part time/non-resident owners? The solution is to tax those people who largely don't use much/any of the services provided such as schools? Yes, that makes a ton of sense. At some point (and I think it already has started) it just won't make sense to have a second home and then they can figure out a way to pay for everything without that group of people.
|