Let's be clear the only ones that brought up suit against the bill that was passed by the state was the company that was no longer going to be paid for services that were no longer needed once the bill passed. The judge should not have set an injunction for them, which by the way while we are all in limbo are not running out to get inspections done and not filling that company's pockets.
Has the state appealed the injunction? and I find it hard to believe the state does not have the ummm, ehhh power to get this lifted and proceed with life and what was passed.
Now if someone wants to bring suit for real factual data on vehicle emissions for vehicles that are under 15 years old causing clear act violations - which the manufacturers have already had to address and the ECM (computers) in the vehicles control and will not allow functions to operate without repair - let me see it?
We are not in 2005 talking about vehicles from the 1990s, for the last 20 plus years emissions standards have been so tight in the 2000s PZEV (Partial zero emission vehicles) enforcements have been in place federally
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries"
|