Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jetskier
The tax revenue is clearly based upon property taxes. Clearly! However, as an out of state property owner, I don't benefit from the lack of income tax. In addition, my contribution to overall cost is much lower than a full time resident...that has been discussed in this thread extensively. As such, it makes no sense to consider higher taxes for out of state owners. In addition, if you are going to run a state with a low tax burden, spending prudence is extremely important. As such, the deferred vacation payout previously mentioned is rankling. I believe that out of state owners carry their fair share of the tax burden. Nuff said.
Jetskier  |
One could counter that it makes no sense to own taxable property where you cannot vote too... Out of state owners carry (willingly) way more than thier fair share. They can always stop buy selling or moving to NH permanently. I live in NH and (willingly) work in MA; comparitively I get nothing for my money, I could quit, but I like my job.