Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

WeirsBeachBoater · 01-26-2007, 03:51 PM

Lets say that there is a hypothetical subdivision.... That Originally deeded lake access to all lots. Along comes the state in the 80's and takes over the RR Line, and also takes by eminent domain frontage for a regional sewer system. Therefore technically severing the owners access to the waterfront. No one says anything for 20 yrs or so.... Then this issue about waterfront leases comes up, No one in said association thinks we should pay to lease that land that has been in use. But alas the RR and the state says technically anyone crossing is a trespasser. So where does that leave the 25-30 landowners with "deeded lake access"? Oh by the way those same owners are taxed according to lake access. Good one huh?

01-26-2007, 03:51 PM	#21
WeirsBeachBoater Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 709 Blog Entries: 9 Thanks: 39 Thanked 148 Times in 65 Posts	My 2 cents Lets say that there is a hypothetical subdivision.... That Originally deeded lake access to all lots. Along comes the state in the 80's and takes over the RR Line, and also takes by eminent domain frontage for a regional sewer system. Therefore technically severing the owners access to the waterfront. No one says anything for 20 yrs or so.... Then this issue about waterfront leases comes up, No one in said association thinks we should pay to lease that land that has been in use. But alas the RR and the state says technically anyone crossing is a trespasser. So where does that leave the 25-30 landowners with "deeded lake access"? Oh by the way those same owners are taxed according to lake access. Good one huh?