...this is getting confusing?
Maybe this is a rewritten version of the ad above and maybe not? If it is then the two ads describing the same thing are not the same, or something. I wonder if both ads are aimed at the same referedum vote item? Any third year law school students out there who can translate?
Is there an armchair election ballot expert on board? What is this all about?
As Paul Harvey used to say, what is the rest of the story?
an advertisement from page 1 of the Feb 16 LaDaSun..........................................
Meredith Voters
Vote to change the minimum lot size in the Forestry and Conservation District from 10 acres minimum to 12 acres minimum.
As currently written, allowing 10 acre minimum lot size voids the possibility of current use because once the home site and driveway are subtracted from the total lot size making Current Use is no longer available to the property owner.
Vote to change the minimum lot size in the Forestry and Conservation District from 10 acres minimum to 12 acres minimum.
Paid for by Marc Abear
|