Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skip
In reference to the claimed 10 foot rule;
Interesting twist on your own words, because in an April 25th post of this year you state (and I quote);
The State of New Hampshire has designated about 10± feet of Winnipesaukee shoreline for use by "citizens" -- so citizens and their pets are presumably allowed to use a narrow portion of waterfront/lakefront property.
Quite frankly, after easily discovering your first faux pas, I decided it isn't fair (or sporting) to wade threw [sic] the plethora of your other posts pointing out similar examples of mis-speak, the audience may feel I am picking on you. 
Skip |
So many invitations....
I'll decline your "invitation" to call Director Barrett (603) 293-2037 (But maybe interview the vintage cruiser's captain, as he is a regular in this locale).
I'll decline your "invitation" to cite New Hampshire
law.
The law is, after all, malleable.
(McKeown was thrown out in a prior hearing).
My quote was plucked from a previous thread regarding New Hampshire's
littoral Rights of the People. (Persons walking on private lakefront property -- or the MP's legal arrest powers thereupon).
I think it was OK to express an opinion, and some day the NH Supreme Court could join this private citizen in that same opinion -- just as they did in
McKeown.