View Single Post
Old 03-22-2007, 05:32 PM   #6
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Wink Study ... analysis ... phooey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
This kind of talk, if accurately quoted, is not helping speed limit supporters. Mr. Pilliod makes it sound like studying something carefully before acting upon it is a bad idea. He apparently thinks everyone should take his words and opinions as gospel and pass the law, regardless of the need.
{snip}
The study I'd like to see is the one that shows 45 and 25 to be the proper numbers for the proposed limits. Why aren't 25 and 5 the right numbers ? Or 66.6 and 31.4159 ....
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline