Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Islander
...Skip - Perhaps you should read my post again. I said there was evidence he was drinking. It was weak evidence however. I notice you used the word "ample" to describe the evidence. Did that come from you or the Supreme Court?...
|
Once again you are incorrect, and I will ask you to please take a few moments and read the Supreme Court case that
you cited.
From the same NH Supreme Court decision:
...There was significant evidence presented concerning the defendant’s consumption of alcohol and his attention level that evening...
Sorry Islander....not "
weak evidence" but "
significant evidence; the difference being, well,
significant!
But hey, thanks for continually sending me these softballs, Lord knows I can use the batting practice!
