I think we need to consider the original post. Based on the literal interpretation of the new law, anything that requires "construction", "excavation" or "filling" within 250 feet of the water would require a permit. Not wanting to speek for shore things, but I believe what he is asking is what activities that do involve "construction", "excavation" or "filling" are so low impact that it would be rediculous to require a permit. For example, planting a flower bulb requires "excavation" (you have to dig a hole), but it would be unreasonable to require someone to pay $100 for a permit and wait 30 days just to plant a tulip. I am assuming that DES will consider our suggestions and come up with an official list of "construction", "excavation" and "filling" activities that do not require a permit.
Here are a few suggestions from me:
1. Planting a flower garden
2. Planting native ground cover
3. Planting a vegatable garden (or does this come under agriculture)
4. Repairing of existing structures where the size is not affected
5. Repairing of existing landscaping (walkways, retaining walls, etc.) where the size is not affected.
6. Construction that takes place entirely within the interior of a building.
7. Construction of non-permanent structures / objects (swing sets, etc)
8. Refreshing of mulches, crushed stones, etc. in previously cleared areas (driveways, walkways, etc.)
Belkin
|