View Single Post
Old 10-11-2007, 09:44 AM   #125
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

I think mwl AND little bear have valid points even though they are conflicting.Shorefront that is naturally exposed to wind driven waves do appear to have natural rocky shores that protect from the same.Take a look at the western shore of Timber.Conversely,smaller coves that never recieve wind driven waves don't have that rocky shore in general.When manmade wakes constantly pound these areas,they are destructive for sure.Without constant manmade fixes to ward off the destruction of the waves,the shoreline will erode and would eventually get to rocky shore barriers.But at the cost of the property owners land?There in lies the rub.I can certainly understand both sides of this one.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote