Quote:
Originally Posted by BR
"I don't believe other states will put this ticket on their out-of-state driver licenses..."
|
http://www.lawguru.com/cgi/bbs/message.php?i=778076277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
"...Why on earth would someone go directly toward any stationary boat at full throttle...?"
|
You're right—how did the MPs get an over-60-MPH figure more than once!?!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
"...I think your unmarked vs. marked boat theory would make perfect sense if there was a speed limit, but there isn't..."
|
Even the buoy tender is marked: the unmarked boats were all reported to be small—a very poor platform for radar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
"...There's no incentive to slow down if there's no speed limit..."
|
You'd
think so, but...
Quote:
"The Marine Patrol came by for 1/2 an hour and those boats didn't buzz me at that point but as soon as the MP left it was back to the way the picture is."
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD
"...3800+ boats is a huge sample..."
|
MPs were counting in both directions: counting boats
twice doesn't make it so "huge".
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD
"...Even at that 97% of the boats would be travelling less than 45 mph. LEGISLATORS THERE IS NO SPEED PROBLEM ON THE LAKE..."
|
With 97% of the boats on the lake, there's no problem.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD
"...Speed limit supporters, I didn't buy your spin before, and I absolutely don't buy it now..."
|
There's no headline that would change your mind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chmeee
"...If I see an unmarked boat chasing me down, I am not stopping..."
|
Not even for the siren and blue-light thingy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chmeee
"...The average is irrelevant anyways..."
|
Agreed...But "the spin" of an average is in print:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
...I cannot imagine any Senator voting for a speed limit after reading the that study, they'd look like an idiot..."
|
Most Senators would recognize a "blind study".
This isn't one.