View Single Post
Old 11-01-2007, 10:51 AM   #6
idigtractors
Senior Member
 
idigtractors's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 248
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaplane Pilot
I'm with you Woodsy. Ames also owns somewhere in the neighborhood of 100 acres on the south side of Rt. 11. I think he should do exactly as you said - flip off the neighbors and the town, and sell this to some big hotel chain/developer that will put a condo development on the water and up the entire hillside on the 100 acres. Then he can sit back and laugh while watching the outrage of the neighbors and granola crowd who are now angry that yet another lakeside hill has been developed. Gilford claims that this has been going on 20 years, but they sure knew where to send the assessor and the tax bill for the last 20 years. This is truely pathetic.
That all sounds fantastic for the Ames family, but what if the town and state is found to be correct in what they write up and they put fines and/or requests for making things back to the way they were and if the owner doesn't then state and town can stick liens on the property and then "No Sale" and possible cease and desist all activities involved in complaints.
idigtractors is offline   Reply With Quote