Thread: Waterfront Poor
View Single Post
Old 01-14-2008, 08:45 AM   #53
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,169
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 310
Thanked 1,103 Times in 812 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wifi View Post
Possibly things have been manipulated to look this way:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9191306AA8GoyX
....................

In 2000, the last NH primary where both parties had contested races, the Republicans had 236,802 votes cast, and in 2008 it remained about the same with 238,548 votes cast.

In the Democatic primary in 2000, there were 154,639 votes cast, and in 2008 it increased up to 258,322 votes cast.
(source Wikipedia)

So, out of all the votes cast in last Tuesday's primaries, it was Democrats with 56% and Republicans with 44% of the total votes cast. This is a big switcheroo from prior contested primaries in 1988, 1992, and 2000 where the G.O.P. had the bigger majority of votes cast.

Senator John Sununu and Governor Jeanne Shaheen have no doubt noticed these numbers.


........................update

Found this www.unionleader.com editorial, Sunday Jan 13, and here's the first two pararaphs.

Turning out: Another primary victory

"More than half a million people voted in Tuesday's presidential primary, making yet another case for the value of the New Hampshire primary.

The total number of voters was 526,553. That's more than half the voting-age population of New Hampshire - not registered voters, but the entire population aged 18 and older. That's an astounding turn-out."

.............................

526,553 total voters

239,000 (45.4%) Republican voters

288,000 (54.6%) Democratic voters

...............................
__________________
.... Banned for life from local thrift store!

Last edited by fatlazyless; 01-14-2008 at 08:00 PM.
fatlazyless is offline   Reply With Quote