Quote:
Originally Posted by hazelnut
Been there done that. #1 I posted my constructive stance on my position. This is back a few weeks ago. Guess you forgot.
#2 Do you really want me to go back and search your posts for evidence of you trying to spin "incidents" into why a Speed Limit is the answer. One needs not even TRY to look that hard. You yourself used the 2002 night time incident as an argument. A twisting of the facts determining speed was the reason BY YOU!
#3 Attacks? If you want to call it an attack every time someone calls you out on your posts attacks go ahead. Just tell the truth and the truth shall set you free. When you openly admit that the Speed Limit is an arbitrary way to rid the lake of excess boat traffic I will have no comment.
#4 Attacks by you... Easy, Check out the thread on sinking boats.  |
Talk about spin....
I only represented the 2002 accident as meeting the specifics you yourself outlined, nothing more.
I have many times described speed limits as a way to control excess boat traffic. So please have no more comments as you promised.
You post a picture of the boat I use to transport my family across the lake in October (and other months) and add....
posted by hazelnut
I call this all individuals on board dead within minutes in late October.
With a Whaler this will not happen. If you think those little foam pieces under the seat of an aluminum boat will keep it afloat you are naive. I guess I am lying about sinking a 14 foot aluminum boat. Oh yeah and the 15 foot fiberglass boat that was on the bottom of the lake. Oh yeah and my buddies 11 foot aluminum boat with just the nose sticking out similar to the picture. Go read all the little articles you want and cite coast guard regs till you are blue in the face. I will go with personal experience. I hope you are done grinding your axe. We are here to share information not spread misiformation due to issues with each others stance on an issue. Thanks
Then you have the nerve to describe these posts as me attacking you....
get a clue