View Single Post
Old 08-02-2004, 08:39 AM   #20
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cabinfever
I don't know why the state didn't jump on it...
cabinfever, I think you answered your own question here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cabinfever
...this shared balance of the island has a conservation easement that prohibits building, utilities and public use
Why would the state buy property that prohibits public use? The state should only buy property to benefit the NH taxpayers. This property is already protected from development, so the state buying it would gain nothing for the taxpayers.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote