I would like more explanation as to what NHMP needs the additional money for. The Lake Restoration and Preservation Fee, the Agent Fe and the Addition to Boat Fees are pretty clear and reasonable, but these changes only represent $5.50 per registration while the bill calls for a 100% increase. NHMP has done a great job keeping our lakes safe since 1989 under the existing fee structure. No disrespect to the department and what they do, but why the big change this year. Are they looking to update the entire fleet, are they looking to maintain all existing positions and pay structures, are they looking to increase the size of the department?
Boat registrations declined last season and will decline again in 09. Like every other business in the country they too can adapt to the evolving market place. A reduction in registered boats will impact their budget but it also means less boating activity to regulate. NHMP is a seasonal business and they utilize part time positions to handle the summer months. They should be able to adjust their budget for changes in boating activity by regulating these part time positions. The current structure may need an inflation adjustment but 100%? Doubling fees as this bill intends would allow NHMP to maintain its current budget with a 50% reduction in boat registrations and activity. A reduction in boating activity should mean a relative reduction in the size of the NHMP department. Again, I think NHMP does a great job but at a time when cuts are being made everywhere, and boating is in decline......what is their justification for the increase.
Chase1
|