Thread: Hb 224
View Single Post
Old 03-22-2009, 09:59 PM   #15
Resident 2B
Senior Member
 
Resident 2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 996
Thanked 314 Times in 164 Posts
Lightbulb Time to do some thinking

I think it is about time that the native folks from New Hampshire started to think about the potential impact of all these really stupid new laws, including the "unspeakable new law". If the result of these stupid new laws was a significant drop in the desire of out-of-state property owners to own waterfront property in New Hampshire, what would the impact be? That is an important question!

If this happened, I believe there would be a significant shift in tax burden from the out-of-state property owners to the New Hampshire property owners not living on the water. This would be the result of a huge fall in lake front property values driving a huge shift in tax burden back to those not living on the water front.

I am a water front owner, so I wold be impacted through a huge loss of property value. I can also vote now, oh boy!! However, the BIGGER issue is the impact on non-water front residents through a major shift in tax burden.

The folks in public office are getting more dangerous every year with their "error-on-the-side-of-safety" thinking. My point is, this 'safe-side-thinking" potentially impacts all New Hampshire residents, not just those that use the lake or own property on the lakes.

It is time to do some very important thinking!

R2B

Last edited by Resident 2B; 03-22-2009 at 11:03 PM. Reason: Grammar correction
Resident 2B is offline   Reply With Quote