Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

MAXUM · 05-10-2009, 08:31 AM

FLL-

And who is supposed to pay for all this? Ah yes the tax payers. Wrong answer.

Tell you what, I would propose dumping each and every entitlement/welfare program in this state and block 1/2 those funds to purchase large parcels of land for preservation and give the other half back to the people. At least something useful would come out of that money.

However as part of that proposal I would ensure that the necessary language was in place to define there shall be no restrictions placed on access to public lands, nor shall there be any fees associated with such access EVER. Last thing we need is property being bought with public funds, a bunch of tree huggers finding some obscure thing (you fill in the blanks) which then they use as an excuse to shut down or severely limit access to said property. Matter of fact it could open up areas in this state to hunting that would otherwise be posted.

05-10-2009, 08:31 AM	#23
MAXUM Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Kuna ID Posts: 2,755 Thanks: 246 Thanked 1,942 Times in 802 Posts	FLL- And who is supposed to pay for all this? Ah yes the tax payers. Wrong answer. Tell you what, I would propose dumping each and every entitlement/welfare program in this state and block 1/2 those funds to purchase large parcels of land for preservation and give the other half back to the people. At least something useful would come out of that money. However as part of that proposal I would ensure that the necessary language was in place to define there shall be no restrictions placed on access to public lands, nor shall there be any fees associated with such access EVER. Last thing we need is property being bought with public funds, a bunch of tree huggers finding some obscure thing (you fill in the blanks) which then they use as an excuse to shut down or severely limit access to said property. Matter of fact it could open up areas in this state to hunting that would otherwise be posted.