Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2015, 07:20 PM   #1
winterh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 254
Thanks: 30
Thanked 135 Times in 62 Posts
Default renovation/addition in a shorefront zone

I have a 1600 sq ft ranch that sits about 25 ft from the lake. About half the home is within the 50 ft setback and half outside or past it. Can I add a second floor within the 50 ft zone as long as I stay above the existing footprint. Are there volume restrictions? For example can a 1600 sq ft home be doubled to 3200 sq ft with a second floor as long as you stay in the footprint? The home is in Wolfeboro if that matters. I am aware of the rules for what % of the lot I can cover but am unsure about going up.
winterh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 10:32 PM   #2
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,454
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 1,651 Times in 1,079 Posts
Default Each town has its own quirks.

Each town has its own quirks. I'd start here
http://www.wolfeboronh.us/Pages/Wolf...Building/index
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 08:28 AM   #3
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 503
Thanks: 12
Thanked 425 Times in 146 Posts
Default

You do not need a State-level Shoreland Protection permit if you don't need any excavation or filling and will stay within the existing footprint. Please note that if there are decks or porches between the lakeward side of the home and the shoreline the law prohibits closing them in and converting them to enclosed living space. If the home is not on sewer you should check in with the DES Subsurface Systems Bureau to see if you need any type of permitting for the septic system.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 09:11 AM   #4
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 669 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Interesting that this question, with a variant, arose last week among my cousins. The question is, if the cottage were to sustain damage, through trees falling or fire, heaven forbid, that required rebuilding, would it be possible to rebuild even though the original footprint was within 50' of the shoreline. One opinion was that it must be rebuilt outside of the 50' zone. The cottage is in Moultonborough. A link would be helpful if no one knows for sure. Thanks.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 09:41 AM   #5
winterh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 254
Thanks: 30
Thanked 135 Times in 62 Posts
Default

I know you can rebuild within the footprint. My question was could you make it larger (2nd floor) as long as footprint stays same. The answer to that is yes. Being an older home with a grandfathered footprint can add good value to a property even if the house itself needs work.
winterh is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-19-2015, 09:54 AM   #6
camp guy
Senior Member
 
camp guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: formerly Winter Harbor, still Wolfeboro
Posts: 1,197
Thanks: 303
Thanked 529 Times in 296 Posts
Default renovation/addition in a shoreland zone

The answer given by "Descant" is, essentially, all you need to know, at first, and then, if it is a go, you are golden, or, if the Town raises questions, you may need a professional to plead your case. The Code Enforcement Officer for the Town is the person you want to have actually come to your site, look at everything, and give you an answer. If you get into the job and all of a sudden somebody changes their mind you could be in a pickle. Get everything in writing, and take pictures.
camp guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 11:39 AM   #7
Onshore
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 503
Thanks: 12
Thanked 425 Times in 146 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles View Post
Interesting that this question, with a variant, arose last week among my cousins. The question is, if the cottage were to sustain damage, through trees falling or fire, heaven forbid, that required rebuilding, would it be possible to rebuild even though the original footprint was within 50' of the shoreline. One opinion was that it must be rebuilt outside of the 50' zone. The cottage is in Moultonborough. A link would be helpful if no one knows for sure. Thanks.
From Chapter Env-Wq 1400 otherwise known as the Shoreland Program Code of Administrative Rules:

Env-Wq 1408.01 Replacement of Pre-existing Nonconforming Primary Structures Damaged By Accidental Means.

(a) The owner of any pre-existing nonconforming primary structure damaged by accidental means who wishes to rebuild the structure in its existing location shall begin construction within 2 years of the date of the accident or such shorter period of time as is specified in local ordinances or regulations.
(b) For purposes of these rules, the time period specified in (a), above, shall not run during the pendency of any legal action that is intended to or has the effect of precluding the owner from rebuilding the structure.
(c) If the owner does not begin construction to replace the pre-existing nonconforming structure within the time period established in (a), above, any primary structure thereafter constructed shall conform to all applicable set-back requirements.
Onshore is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Onshore For This Useful Post:
Pineedles (08-19-2015)
Old 08-19-2015, 03:57 PM   #8
Pineedles
Senior Member
 
Pineedles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moultonborough & CT
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 1,074
Thanked 669 Times in 368 Posts
Default

Thank you so much shore things. I appreciate the time it took for you to dig this up. I hope we never have to use it.
Pineedles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 06:18 PM   #9
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,939
Thanks: 481
Thanked 695 Times in 390 Posts
Default

I think the can of worms that gets opened on a project like this is the septic system, which may be required to be upgraded to current codes. I say a can of worms because some properties may end up with tight tanks..... or so I've heard.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.17957 seconds