Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Register FAQ Members List Donate Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2025, 08:24 AM   #1
Chimi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 106
Thanks: 51
Thanked 51 Times in 28 Posts
Default Lake Winnipesaukee Alliance Survey

It’s surprising that there was not a better response to the postcards sent to property owners by the Lake Winnipesaukee Alliance, especially since the overall quality of the lake is in decline.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...ntent=headline
Chimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 09:17 AM   #2
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,982
Thanks: 2,252
Thanked 783 Times in 559 Posts
Unhappy Agreed, But Looking in "The Wrong Places"...

Quote:
"While slope and proximity of the structure to the shore can generally not be changed, there could be improvements, like making sure a steep slope is vegetated."
I have a steep slope that is vegetated, but my trees and shrubs are gradually falling into Winter Harbor. This, along with my neighbors' trees, is more noticeable when the lake is at "Full Pond".

Right now, in mid-September, lakewater clarity from the 1970s has returned. Isn't time to take Seiche-disc measurements?



An existing home one street upslope from Sewall Road lakefronts has demolished every green thing covering their two acre lots. (Totally razed).



Someone across Winter Harbor has spent ALL last week removing trees with a crane and chipping them into trailers.

__________________
Is it
"Common Sense" isn't.
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 12:07 PM   #3
Winilyme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Ice in = CT / Ice out = Winnipesaukee
Posts: 529
Thanks: 147
Thanked 308 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimi View Post
It’s surprising that there was not a better response to the postcards sent to property owners by the Lake Winnipesaukee Alliance, especially since the overall quality of the lake is in decline.

https://www.laconiadailysun.com/news...ntent=headline
Doesn't surprise me. Unless people are personally impacted, too many of them just don't care. If they don't have to do something beneficial for the lake they won't. Sadly, that'll mean laws, enforcement and administration.
Winilyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 01:09 PM   #4
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,111
Thanks: 214
Thanked 675 Times in 448 Posts
Default

So if I understand correctly, individuals are keeping photographic evidence of others shoreline property to possible help them make decisions in the future. Or as I see it, illegally documenting someone else’s property to use against each shoreline property owner who does things not to other’s liking.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
WinnisquamZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 02:21 PM   #5
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

Where is the statute that makes it illegal?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post:
Descant (Yesterday)
Sponsored Links
Old 09-13-2025, 02:29 PM   #6
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,111
Thanks: 214
Thanked 675 Times in 448 Posts
Default

It is illegal to use photos taken of others property without consent and use those photos against them or for personal gain. Has been noted many times in court cases though out the country


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
WinnisquamZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 05:24 PM   #7
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,128
Thanks: 1,343
Thanked 564 Times in 291 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
It is illegal to use photos taken of others property without consent and use those photos against them or for personal gain. Has been noted many times in court cases though out the country


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
The state of New Hampshire takes aerial photos of the various lakes. They can then use this evidence to prosecute environmental violators. I assume it is legal if the state does it?
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 09:46 PM   #8
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,457
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,046 Times in 650 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
It is illegal to use photos taken of others property without consent and use those photos against them or for personal gain. Has been noted many times in court cases though out the country


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
So I'm in a traffic accident, I take a photo of the other guy's car in case there's a dispute, I show he has no damage, and that's illegal?

I own a property that's an eyesore and not complying with a town ordinance, my neighbor photographs the junked car on my lawn, and I go after him?

I think not, in both cases. But maybe you have a source?
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 10:02 PM   #9
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
It is illegal to use photos taken of others property without consent and use those photos against them or for personal gain. Has been noted many times in court cases though out the country


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Do you have a link?
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2025, 09:55 PM   #10
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 634
Thanks: 100
Thanked 227 Times in 149 Posts
Default

It’s legal of course. There’s no trespass involved. There’s no expectation of privacy on your lawn when it fronts the lake, which is public. The lack of response, I’m sure, is due to resentment of perceived do-gooders trying to shame homeowners into doing something that the proud-of-themselves falsely virtuous people think should be done. It’s the same tactic that the utility companies use when sending people comparisons of their neighbors’ supposed energy-efficiency stats. Such activities are demonstrably doomed to fail for obvious reasons, even if arguably done with the best of intentions.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LoveLakeLife For This Useful Post:
stingray (Yesterday)
Old 09-13-2025, 10:17 PM   #11
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveLakeLife View Post
It’s legal of course. There’s no trespass involved. There’s no expectation of privacy on your lawn when it fronts the lake, which is public. The lack of response, I’m sure, is due to resentment of perceived do-gooders trying to shame homeowners into doing something that the proud-of-themselves falsely virtuous people think should be done. It’s the same tactic that the utility companies use when sending people comparisons of their neighbors’ supposed energy-efficiency stats. Such activities are demonstrably doomed to fail for obvious reasons, even if arguably done with the best of intentions.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
That depends on the threshold for success.

If the LWA feels that even one positive response is worth the effort - then it was a success.

If they set the bar at 100% - then the program has little chance of ever being successful.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:54 PM   #12
LoveLakeLife
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 634
Thanks: 100
Thanked 227 Times in 149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
That depends on the threshold for success.



If the LWA feels that even one positive response is worth the effort - then it was a success.



If they set the bar at 100% - then the program has little chance of ever being successful.


Valid point, John, thanks.


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
LoveLakeLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:52 PM   #13
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

I think they may be trying to rely on some natural tendencies that we have.

First, we tend to be somewhat competitive. So a grading system brings that out in us.

Second, our landscapes naturally change over time.

Many of the camps around the lake are craftsman buildings that were built among the trees. As the trees succumbed to damage, disease, and age; we remove them to protect the building from being fell upon.

That leads us toward lawns.
Lawns can be expensive and time consuming, so offering us a simple, less expensive landscape option comes into play over time.
Directing that seems to be their focus.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:09 PM   #14
Descant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Merrimack and Welch Island
Posts: 4,454
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 1,651 Times in 1,079 Posts
Default

The appearance is that NHLAKES ansd LWA have similar goals. N HLAKES approach is education. LWA approaches witrh aggression and enforcement.
Descant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:58 AM   #15
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,389
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 2,124 Times in 1,315 Posts
Default

Maybe it was the medium—I toss almost 100% of mail that isn't immediately relevant these days without much of a glance.

Digital casts a wider net, of course, but then the target is less precise.

Door to door would be the best bet—that is, if the questions don't put the owners on the spot. Did the questions involve NARCing neighbors out?!

Sent from my SM-S931U using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:00 AM   #16
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

I don't think they sent questions.

I think they took pictures of the property, graded its shore vegetation according to BMP, and sent it to the address that the tax bills go to.

Someone on here may have more information about it.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:57 AM   #17
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,457
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,046 Times in 650 Posts
Default

I volunteer at LWA, so I heard a bit about this in passing. They took the photos as part of a comprehensive review of lake shoreline. They are not NARCing anyone, they are trying to work with each owner to help them reduce their impact, but it's all voluntary
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:27 AM   #18
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2,111
Thanks: 214
Thanked 675 Times in 448 Posts
Default

Answer the following question, if a tree disappears during the winter months or a few rocks are relocated or removed to make one’s shoreline more enjoyable will our organization use those photos of record against the homeowner if a complaint is made?
The same homeowners they request funding from are the same people you will go after if something is done with your approval. Wake-up people!


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
WinnisquamZ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:23 PM   #19
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,814
Thanks: 759
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,025 Posts
Default

Not sure I like the sounds of this. It sounds like big brother to me.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:45 PM   #20
fatlazyless
Senior Member
 
fatlazyless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,848
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 303
Thanked 1,033 Times in 752 Posts
Arrow Transform your property

Transform your property into a lake-friendly paradise:

lawns ......................www.nhlakes.org/lake-friendly-lawn-care/

hard surfaces ...........http://www.nhlakes.org/transform-har...iendly-spaces/

along the shoreline ...http://www.nhlakes.org/lake-friendly...the-shoreline/

septic systems ........ http://www.nhlakes.org/healthy-septi...althier-lakes/

fireworks ................ www.nhlakes.org/fireworks-and-our-lakes/

wake responsibly ..... http://www.goodhueboat.com/blog/wake...terways--90871
__________________
Walk'n two miles each and every day, keeps the doctor away!

Last edited by fatlazyless; Yesterday at 01:52 PM.
fatlazyless is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:43 PM   #21
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,526
Thanks: 3
Thanked 623 Times in 514 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WinnisquamZ View Post
Answer the following question, if a tree disappears during the winter months or a few rocks are relocated or removed to make one’s shoreline more enjoyable will our organization use those photos of record against the homeowner if a complaint is made?
The same homeowners they request funding from are the same people you will go after if something is done with your approval. Wake-up people!


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
Anyone can take pictures of the shorefront.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.12389 seconds