Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2006, 10:58 AM   #1
BlackCatIslander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 201
Thanks: 52
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default When will the No Wake be eliminated?

Now, that the lake is slowly going down, when will the state drop the no wake within 600' rule? As I write this, the lake is about 7'' above full. Assuming no significant rainfall, I presume that by Saturday we will be down at least another 4 or 5 inches.
BlackCatIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 11:47 AM   #2
itchin for fishin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 105
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default Dam rate down

Just noticed that they reduced the flow rate from about 2400 CFS to 2000 CFS. Seems like they are readying a return to "high normal". See site:

http://www.des.state.nh.us/rti_data/LKPN3_TABLE.HTML

How is it lakeside?
itchin for fishin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:09 PM   #3
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

With the rain we had over the weekend and the rain predicted this week, I would be surprised if we break 504.32 by Saturday. That's always listed as the normal high, but if you look at Bizer's chart the lake exceeds that very often. If you look at the state chart, the upper bound of the standard deviation for this time of year is above 504.5 maybe 504.6 or even 504.7. That's reachable by Saturday. Looks like we are at 504.86 right now.

My sources:

http://www.bizer.com/bztnews.htm#lakelevel

http://www.des.state.nh.us/Dam/graph/graph2006.htm
http://www.des.state.nh.us/Dam/graph/chart2006.htm

http://www.des.state.nh.us/rti_inter...pesaukee#graph

http://www.des.state.nh.us/rti_data/wein3_TABLE.HTML
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:31 PM   #4
TomC
Senior Member
 
TomC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 653
Thanks: 19
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
Default rain over the weekend?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc
With the rain we had over the weekend ...
i looked at a couple of US Geological Survey sites that show recent precipitation and it showed less than 1" fell over the weekend in both Tilton (nearest functional station at south end of lake) and Tamworth (nearest functional station at north end of lake). Are these inaccurate? Was there appreciably more rain than this?
TomC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 02:07 PM   #5
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC
i looked at a couple of US Geological Survey sites that show recent precipitation and it showed less than 1" fell over the weekend in both Tilton (nearest functional station at south end of lake) and Tamworth (nearest functional station at north end of lake). Are these inaccurate? Was there appreciably more rain than this?
That seems about right, I didn't mean to exagerate the rain. Just noting that was some.

Don't forget that the watershed is saturated and it's a lot bigger than the lake, so a widespread inch of rain can be more than an inch of lake height.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 06-05-2006, 02:11 PM   #6
Rose
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 498
Thanks: 62
Thanked 71 Times in 32 Posts
Default Totals from Laconia Airport

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC
i looked at a couple of US Geological Survey sites that show recent precipitation and it showed less than 1" fell over the weekend in both Tilton (nearest functional station at south end of lake) and Tamworth (nearest functional station at north end of lake). Are these inaccurate? Was there appreciably more rain than this?
Here are the daily precip totals for the month from the airport:

June 1 - 0.45"
June 2 - 0.01"
June 3 - 0.32"
June 4 - 0.01"

Rose
Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 02:34 PM   #7
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

That sounds about right to me.Most of the heavy rain fell south of the Winni watershed.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2006, 08:44 AM   #8
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

It looks like my predictions were optimistic. The lake is at 504.84 again, back up an inch or so. Looks like another week of 600' NWZ.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2006, 09:51 AM   #9
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,964
Thanks: 80
Thanked 978 Times in 439 Posts
Default

We have gotten pummeled with rain the last few days... but the weather is looking to clear up sometime tomorrow... long range looks good for the middle of Bike Week.

So maybe by next weekend?

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2006, 05:56 PM   #10
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

I'm selfishly hoping that the Keeper holds the water a little longer.

After the recent flood downstream from Winni, the recent rains, and I assume runoff from Winni, have put the Merrimack River back up over the banks at the Lowel Motor Boat Club again.

We have yet to get our docks, any boats (with the exception of the one we lost over the falls) or even the safety barrells out onto the water!

I was at the club yesterday and today and there does not appear to be any sign the water is receding. The good news is it didn't come up too much overnight. (but it did come up an inch or so on the boat ramp and over the wall into the side yard)

I'm headed up to the lake sometime this week, it'll be the first bike week I will be at the lake where my friends and I don't have a boat in the water! So I have conflicting interests, I don't want more water down stream, and the lake has too much water...

EVERYONE....DO A NO MORE RAIN DANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006, 03:37 PM   #11
Orion
Senior Member
 
Orion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
Default It's rising again!

Watching the level at our dock and it appears to have gone up almost an inch already today!
Orion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2006, 01:03 PM   #12
Weekend Pundit
Senior Member
 
Weekend Pundit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilford
Posts: 343
Thanks: 26
Thanked 68 Times in 41 Posts
Default "No Wake Zone? What No Wake Zone?" Part II

I was out on the lake today and I was amazed at of the folks who were out there weren't aware of the extended No Wake Zone.

One fellow was just coming out from under the Governor's Island bridge and started to roll up on his throttle. I signalled to him to slow down. He backed off and came aside. When I informed him of the extended no wake zone, he didn't believe me. A quick call to the Marine Patrol on VHF 16 to inquire about it proved the point. The guy was apologetic and wondered why he didn't know about it. I told him I wasn't surprised as it wasn't all that well publicized except a day or two before Memorial Day weekend.

He asked when it would be repealed and I told him I didn't know and that he best check with the MP before heading out.
Weekend Pundit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 05:14 AM   #13
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,932
Thanks: 2,201
Thanked 776 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC
i looked at a couple of US Geological Survey sites that show recent precipitation and it showed less than 1" fell over the weekend in both Tilton (nearest functional station at south end of lake) and Tamworth (nearest functional station at north end of lake). Are these inaccurate? Was there appreciably more rain than this?
Tamworth is too far west of those great rain-makers, the Ossipee Mountains.

At most sundowns late last week, showers rained on the southern slopes of the Ossipees. Most of that runoff goes directly to the Melvin River, and then to Lake Winnipesaukee.

In the calm of this morning's lake surface, I see that my dock is once more IN the lake, rather than above it. Within a stone's throw, two new docks have floating pieces secured only by conduit, and have sunk below the surface again.

There doesn't seem to be any uniform observance of this new lakewide NWZ ruling—obviously an experiment gone wrong: There are boats 1200' off shore going slightly above NW, and some others close to shore going at top speed! Where the lake narrows so that no boat can be 600' offshore, nobody slows. (Somebody yesterday had an airhorn at that location, and used it—a lot!).

Because there are so few boats on the lake, "anything goes"?
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 06:52 AM   #14
sea_n_ski
Member
 
sea_n_ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atkinson & Meredith, NH
Posts: 45
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Who is in charge of controlling the flow of the dam? Why would they cut the flow back while the lake is still rising? So your telling me we should all be flooded so some boat club in Lowell MA isn’t?

I actually was the one who called WMUR and convinced them to do the story last week. I did it because I called the governors’ office and was really upset with their reaction to this situation. Our lake is getting trashed. Our docks are taking on damage and people are ignoring the No Wake. Their response was that our Governor wants “Everyone to enjoy beautiful NH”. When I pressed about the situation and reminded them that there are plenty of taxpayers suffering , they directed me to marine patrol or wetlands. They actually said it was the MP fault things were out of control on the lake. I told the woman that the Governor is putting the MP in a no win situation.

Basically he is passing the buck and not dealing with the situation. I heard him speak at a business dinner and was embarrassed that he represents our state. Here he has a room full of business people trying to make his state better and tells stupid irrelevant canned stores he probably gives to the girl scouts. He was supposed to present an award to the fastest growing business in the state and he walked out just before the ceremony. Everyone should call the governors’ office (603)271-2121 and let him know how unhappy we all are.

The guy is hiding behind his desk with a stupid “no decision” on the lake level. Tell him to be a man and address the issue and at least have a response. Tell him to explain to all of us why he did what he did and what he plans to rectify the situation. Tell him to open the dam!
sea_n_ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 10:27 AM   #15
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Thumbs down How fast is fast enough

Quote:
Originally Posted by sea_n_ski
Who is in charge of controlling the flow of the dam? Why would they cut the flow back while the lake is still rising? So your telling me we should all be flooded so some boat club in Lowell MA isn’t?
{snip}
The guy is hiding behind his desk with a stupid “no decision” on the lake level. Tell him to be a man and address the issue and at least have a response. Tell him to explain to all of us why he did what he did and what he plans to rectify the situation. Tell him to open the dam!
Aaaah I dunno about you but I wouldn't call the present rate (2050 CFS) out of the dam as being anything close to "closed". It may be down from the ~2500 max I've seen but it's not like the dam keepers aren't doing anything. The lake is going down. While it's not unreasonable to assume the reduction is out of concern for the downstream residents it might also be out of concern for the dam. I thought rates over 1000 CFS were beyond the normal operation of the dam and achieved only by opening the flood gates. For all I know they've flowed so much water recently that there's some other (structural) reason they can't leave the gate(s) opened.

But let's assume it's because the downstream people can't handle any more flow. Remember that just downsteam are Winnisquam & Silver lakes and when Winni goes up/down a foot, that same quantity of water can cause 5+ ft of rise/fall on Silver lake. Right now Winnisquam is ~1 ft over normal (about what we are). I guess we should just screw them ? Tell you what though, I'll try to arrange a meeting between you and someone downstream. We'll lock you both in a room and you can yell "Me, me, me, me .... My docks, my docks, my docks" until your ears burst. Geesh
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH

Last edited by Mee-n-Mac; 06-14-2006 at 12:06 PM.
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 10:54 AM   #16
Moultonborolifeguard
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mee-n-Mac
Aaaah I dunno about you but I wouldn't call the present rate (2050 CFS) out of the dam as being anything close to "closed". It may be down from the ~2500 max I've seen but it's not like they dam keepers aren't doing anything. The lake is going down. While it's not unreasonable to assume the reduction is out of concern for the downstream residents it might also be out of concern for the dam. I thought rates over 1000 CFS were beyond the normal operation of the dam and achieved only by opening the flood gates. For all I know they've flowed so much water recently that there's some other (structural) reason they can't leave the gate(s) opened.

But let's assume it's because the downstream people can't handle anymore flow. Remember that just downsteam are Winnisquam & Silver lakes and when Winni goes up/down a foot, that same quantity of water can cause 5+ ft of rise/fall on Silver lake. Right now Winnisquam is ~1 ft over normal (about what we are). I guess we should just screw them ? Tell you what though, I'll try to arrange a meeting between you and someone downstream. We'll lock you both in a room and you can yell "Me, me, me, me .... My docks, my docks, my docks" until your ears burst. Geesh
Well there are certainly more people on winnipesaukee then on winnisquam so I think the upstrem people would win that fight. But seriously we really can't screw the people downstream that much. I mean think how pissed you'd be if you were downstream.
Moultonborolifeguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 03:33 PM   #17
Resident 2B
Senior Member
 
Resident 2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 1,357
Thanks: 993
Thanked 313 Times in 163 Posts
Default Flow through the Weirs Channel

Last week before they slowed the discharge to about 2000 CFPS from 2500 CFPS, the current in the Weirs channel was very strong and some bigger boats were having a hard time maintaining control going with the flow when smaller boats ahead of them were going very (too) slow. As I was heading towards the Weirs, a 34 foot crusier coming towards me got almost completely sideways and was out of control for 20 to 30 seconds. No contact, but almost a four boat collision.

The reduced flow helps that situation.

R2B

Last edited by Resident 2B; 06-14-2006 at 06:09 PM.
Resident 2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 01:15 PM   #18
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,983
Thanks: 246
Thanked 743 Times in 443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sea_n_ski
Who is in charge of controlling the flow of the dam? Why would they cut the flow back while the lake is still rising? So your telling me we should all be flooded so some boat club in Lowell MA isn’t?

I actually was the one who called WMUR and convinced them to do the story last week. I did it because I called the governors’ office and was really upset with their reaction to this situation. Our lake is getting trashed. Our docks are taking on damage and people are ignoring the No Wake. Their response was that our Governor wants “Everyone to enjoy beautiful NH”. When I pressed about the situation and reminded them that there are plenty of taxpayers suffering , they directed me to marine patrol or wetlands. They actually said it was the MP fault things were out of control on the lake. I told the woman that the Governor is putting the MP in a no win situation.

Basically he is passing the buck and not dealing with the situation. I heard him speak at a business dinner and was embarrassed that he represents our state. Here he has a room full of business people trying to make his state better and tells stupid irrelevant canned stores he probably gives to the girl scouts. He was supposed to present an award to the fastest growing business in the state and he walked out just before the ceremony. Everyone should call the governors’ office (603)271-2121 and let him know how unhappy we all are.

The guy is hiding behind his desk with a stupid “no decision” on the lake level. Tell him to be a man and address the issue and at least have a response. Tell him to explain to all of us why he did what he did and what he plans to rectify the situation. Tell him to open the dam!
One would hope that highly qualified people are in charge of such things and have taken all the consequences of their actions into consideration when making their decisions. I seriously doubt the decision to set the lake outflow is made randomly, or at the Governer's level. I honestly hope he does not meddle with such affairs since he's quite likely not qualified. Managing nature has never been easy or wildly successful; the last person I'd want to even try would be a politician. Well, maybe not the last person, but close.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 04:48 PM   #19
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
Talking Alright, who moved Tamworth!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acres per Second
...Tamworth is too far west of those great rain-makers, the Ossipee Mountains...:
Actually, Tamworth is very clearly north and east of the Ossipees...
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 08:21 PM   #20
Ken B
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Does Newfound have the same 600nwz? I didn't see it listed in the paper but who trusts the paper anyways?

Ken
Ken B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 11:28 PM   #21
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Smile No NWZ on Newfound

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken B
Does Newfound have the same 600nwz? I didn't see it listed in the paper but who trusts the paper anyways?

Ken
Nope, according to the following, Newfound Lake is unaffected;

Saf-C 402.001 Emergency Restriction. Notwithstanding any rule to the contrary, until further notice, not person shall operate a vessel at a speed greater than headway speed within 600 feet from shoreline upon the waters of Silver Lake in the towns of Tilton and Belmont, Lake Winnipesaukee, Lake Winnisquam and Lake Opechee.

Also when I check Newfound's level it's normal;
http://www.des.state.nh.us/RTi_Home/...found+Lake+Dam
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2006, 01:38 PM   #22
Lakewinniboater
Senior Member
 
Lakewinniboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westford, MA and Alton Bay, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default when no wake will be lifted

for those wondering and haven't checked on this site.... http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/s...rol/index.html
this is where they will post it when lifted.
__________________
Wendy
"Wasn't Me!"
Lakewinniboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 03:06 PM   #23
Seadoo
Senior Member
 
Seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default is it gone yet

any new news on the 600ft NWZ???
will it be gone this coming weekend do you think?
Seadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 03:13 PM   #24
Woodsy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Weirs Beach
Posts: 1,964
Thanks: 80
Thanked 978 Times in 439 Posts
Default

I don't think they will rescind it until the level reaches full lake... We need to drop another 6.00" or so to get there...

Woodsy
__________________
The only way to eliminate ignorant behavior is through education. You can't fix stupid.
Woodsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 05:04 PM   #25
BlackCatIslander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 201
Thanks: 52
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default Probably not this weekend

They seem to be holding the level steady as they release flows downstream, so I would guess that we need another 10 days or so to get close to full lake. Pray for a dry weather pattern.
BlackCatIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 06:02 PM   #26
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

The dam operators backed off from 2400 CFS to 2000 CFS, just as last weekend's storms came through. That bumped the lake back up a few inches to 504.9. It seems to have peaked and should be headed down again.

I'm guessing somewhere around 504.6. That's about four inches lower, I don't think we'll make it by Friday. Monday might be a good day, after the bikers leave.

The blue section on this chart is the target:
http://www.des.state.nh.us/Dam/graph/graph2006.htm
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 06:06 PM   #27
Seadoo
Senior Member
 
Seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default since

well knowbody goes NW anyway!
Seadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 06:16 PM   #28
BlackCatIslander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 201
Thanks: 52
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default Observing the 600' NWZ

From my limited observations, in my area of the lake the boat traffic is minimal and almost ( not everyone ) obeys the rule. From the various posts, this observation seems to be the exception rather than the rule.
BlackCatIslander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 06:23 PM   #29
Seadoo
Senior Member
 
Seadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 67
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

this past weekend (sunday) knowbody in the Paugus Bay area was doing the 600NWZ
Seadoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 07:15 PM   #30
DRH
Senior Member
 
DRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Meredith, NH
Posts: 1,686
Thanks: 1,199
Thanked 675 Times in 178 Posts
Default Not Being Observed Here Either

Few boaters are observing the 600 ft. NWZ in the West Alton area either. We saw some today who weren't even obeying the standard 150 ft. rule. I don't think its due to lack of knowledge, either. Amazing how the presence of a MP boat results in instant compliance. As soon as he leaves, ....
__________________
DRH
DRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2006, 09:38 PM   #31
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,595
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,448
Thanked 1,978 Times in 1,079 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRH
Few boaters are observing the 600 ft. NWZ in the West Alton area either. We saw some today who weren't even obeying the standard 150 ft. rule. I don't think its due to lack of knowledge, either. Amazing how the presence of a MP boat results in instant compliance. As soon as he leaves, ....
It's kinda the same thing as seeing the state cop sitting on the crossover in the median on 93. Everyone hits the brakes, gets by the cruiser, and then it's back up to 70+!
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2006, 02:12 PM   #32
feb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Meredith (Winnisquam) & Nashua, NH
Posts: 213
Thanks: 25
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Default For All Intents and Purposes Its Over

Based on what I'm seeing on Winnisquam this afternoon, combined with the projected beautiful weather, it's probably safe to say that, unofficially, it's over in the eyes of the boaters I see right now.
feb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2006, 06:47 AM   #33
Orion
Senior Member
 
Orion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cow Island
Posts: 914
Thanks: 602
Thanked 193 Times in 91 Posts
Default It doesn't matter

When it will be lifted is irrelevant.

Here's why:

1. The rule was worthless because it caved to a 600' limit vs. whole lake.
2. It isn't being enforced.
3. Nobody is following it.
Orion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2006, 05:42 PM   #34
jonr
Member
 
jonr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilford, NH
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default NW enforcement

In the Gilford/Varney Pt/Glendale Smith Cove area many most people are observing the 600 ft NW. I'd say at least 70 to 80% that go by my house. This afternoon Marine Patrol had 3 boats in the area and they were doing a good job at getting those who weren't doing NW.
jonr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2006, 05:53 PM   #35
Moultonborolifeguard
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonr
In the Gilford/Varney Pt/Glendale Smith Cove area many most people are observing the 600 ft NW. I'd say at least 70 to 80% that go by my house. This afternoon Marine Patrol had 3 boats in the area and they were doing a good job at getting those who weren't doing NW.
Isn't that the area right in front of marina patrol head quarters? I know a lot of people in that cove go NW anyway because theres usually a lot of boats there, and like i said its right in front of marine patrol headquarters.
Moultonborolifeguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2006, 02:58 PM   #36
jonr
Member
 
jonr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gilford, NH
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default NW enforcement

I take it back. When Marine Patrol isn't around compliance does go dramatically down. Still there are a lot of people making an effort. More than I would have thought.
jonr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2006, 03:38 PM   #37
DRH
Senior Member
 
DRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Meredith, NH
Posts: 1,686
Thanks: 1,199
Thanked 675 Times in 178 Posts
Default Little Compliance Here

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonr
I take it back. When Marine Patrol isn't around compliance does go dramatically down. Still there are a lot of people making an effort. More than I would have thought.
Today we saw the most boat traffic so far this season. I'd estimate maybe 5% obeyed the 600' NWZ, and even that might be generous. We only noticed one MP boat, which went by around 10 A.M. this morning, all day.
__________________
DRH
DRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.24192 seconds