New No wake Zone

ITD · 08-26-2005, 08:37 AM

Yeah,

Great job, there had to have been 10 to 20 accidents there a week. Of course there is no way you can legally pass above headway at 150 feet there anyway because the markers are too close together (what, that's not true, doesn't matter to the RULEMAKERS). Backed up traffic won't be a problem either. I loved the public hearings on this also, well publicized and attended and thought out....... I think every channel that is less than 500 feet wide should be a NWZ. I'll sleep much better at night.

08-26-2005, 08:37 AM	#11
ITD Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Moultonboro, NH Posts: 2,934 Thanks: 478 Thanked 694 Times in 389 Posts	Yeah, Great job, there had to have been 10 to 20 accidents there a week. Of course there is no way you can legally pass above headway at 150 feet there anyway because the markers are too close together (what, that's not true, doesn't matter to the RULEMAKERS). Backed up traffic won't be a problem either. I loved the public hearings on this also, well publicized and attended and thought out....... I think every channel that is less than 500 feet wide should be a NWZ. I'll sleep much better at night.