Lavinia's

Newbiesaukee · 01-28-2014, 03:24 PM

As long as we are, apparently, having a philosophic discussion....From what I can find on the Internet, including the above link, the term "executive chef" is a job description, not a title of honor or competence. The job description does require many tasks but it is not really a measure of experience or competence. In the same way a CEO is a job description, it is someone who performs certain functions. Whether you just finished business school or have thirty years of experience, if you do the tasks you can be a CEO. Now whether you are a GOOD CEO or GOOD Executive Chef is a totally different issue. You can be an executive chef, accomplished or not.

01-28-2014, 03:24 PM	#11
Newbiesaukee Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer Posts: 1,366 Thanks: 967 Thanked 575 Times in 300 Posts	As long as we are, apparently, having a philosophic discussion....From what I can find on the Internet, including the above link, the term "executive chef" is a job description, not a title of honor or competence. The job description does require many tasks but it is not really a measure of experience or competence. In the same way a CEO is a job description, it is someone who performs certain functions. Whether you just finished business school or have thirty years of experience, if you do the tasks you can be a CEO. Now whether you are a GOOD CEO or GOOD Executive Chef is a totally different issue. You can be an executive chef, accomplished or not. __________________ "You're only young once, but you can be immature forever."

The Following User Says Thank You to Newbiesaukee For This Useful Post:
VitaBene (01-28-2014)