|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Gallery | Webcams | Blogs | YouTube Channel | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Members List | Donate | Today's Posts | Search |
| View Poll Results: Due to the high water level, should there be a temporary Lake Wide No Wake Zone? | |||
| No, I should be able to decide if I want to run at headway speed or not. |
   
|
27 | 24.32% |
| Yes, there should be mandatory No Wake Zone. |
  
|
84 | 75.68% |
| Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-25-2006, 12:15 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
|
I believe that a mandatory no wake zone should be implemented on Winnipesaukee. I am not a lakefront property owner, but I think that it is the best solution for the existing problem. We have to look at the big picture. It's not just the waterfront property owners who are suffering. The health and future of the lake must be taken into consideration.
__________________
Education is hanging around 'til you've caught on - Frost |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode